On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 05:43:21 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A.//Anti-Debunking Unit Pro-Tem (ADUPT) <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:

In article <osa8hv0l9tu4f3jrgvp6em5nflnnvto2pi@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

As radio telescope power increases over the years I am sure we will
see more concerted broadcasting attempts than the Arecibo one, just as
SETI was originally far patchier in its coverage when it started.

The fact is, we have a greater chance at success in the short term
with listening rather than broadcasting.

Patty, Even I don't (to use a debunker term) "believe"
that you "believe" that drivel you write.  It is
so beyond ludicrous and totally without merit
that to even comment on it would be a waste of time and space!

We both know that it isn't a case of you not wanting to comment, it's
a case of you not being able to comment.

Think SETI is pointless? Then you have to prove that aliens are
already here. To do that you need to have investigated at least one
case. But it is a fact that you have never named one case you
personally have investigated.

Do you want to change that now? No? What a surprise.


David Patrick