| Subject: Re: More naked skepticism |
| From: Garry Bryan |
| Date: 17/07/2003, 17:38 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks |
In alt.alien.visitors Richard Caldwell <rhc1536@cox.net> wrote:
: Kavik Kang wrote in message ...
:>
:>"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
:>news:12d9886ceb8b5e3f9c23cadae57a9d8c@news.meganetnews.com...
:>> Only people out on
:>> the lunatic fringe, with no evidence and only faith or fantasies
:>> or fraud to back up their claims
:>
:>Oh, I almost forgot too mention... You are describing yourself perfectly
:>here. You insist that there is this "great wall" and yet do not even
: attempt
:>to provide any evidence for your extraordinary claim. You apparently have
:>only faith, fantasies, or fuad to back up those claims. You are out on the
:>lunatic fringe, Wallie.
:>
:>Keep running...
: Well, Kavik, I see that the flamers have circled around you, nipping at
: your flanks. There will be no more constructive discourse in this thread,
: as long as you continue to respond to them. My personal philosophy is,
: don't feed them and maybe they'll go away. d8-]
: By the way, flamers don't seem to be any more concentrated on one
: side of the issue than the other. If a serious poster sounds pro-ETH,
: the anti-flamers attack. If they sound anti-ETH, the pro-flamers attack.
: So, you get a choice whether you are attacked by jackles or hyenas.
: I'll leave it to you which is which.
HRYK. . .
Garry