"Richard Caldwell" <rhc1536@cox.net> wrote in message
news:QsnRa.52316$o86.7592@news1.central.cox.net...

Kavik Kang wrote in message ...
Well, Kavik, I see that the flamers have circled around you, nipping at
your flanks.  There will be no more constructive discourse in this thread,
as long as you continue to respond to them.  My personal philosophy is,
don't feed them and maybe they'll go away.  d8-]

I wanted them to come too me, I wanted them too attack. It's the best way to
illustrate their methods. If you just say they do a thing, they and their
supporters just demand proof for something they have seen a million times,
and then you those very dishonest tactics to deny that evidence too. It's an
endless game that can never be won by the claimant. But if you make them do
it first, then go back through it with the audience... lessons are learned.
It is my only goal. Quite a sane and rational position if you ask me,
especially considering that I only undertake this activity for a few weeks
every few years, absolutely nothing "kooky" about it. I actually accomplish
something (at the very least, some people newer too the subject get a crash
course on some of these tactics), whereas most on the proponent side of the
debate never really do accomplish anything.