Subject: Re: More naked skepticism
From: Pete Charest
Date: 19/07/2003, 01:21
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:49:20 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:


"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:r8cehvs4t2h30uv9u9cq3do58kfgqqpnh3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:07:05 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:

You saying that they aren't good examples doesn't make it true. They are
both excelent examples. Pete came screaming out of the blue for no
reason,


Wrong again, KKK. I am the very embodiment of reason. You, however,
are a crackpot and saucerheaded gullible buffoon.

You are definately 

Definitely, dumbass.

Kind of like when you tried to
call me gullible, 

I didn't *try*. I did. And you still are.


Your real name is Kavik The Kooky Kangaroo.

hahaha...what an asshole you are.

I am running out of ways in which to point out how childish, and just plain
stupid, you are. 

That's because you have a childish and profoundly stupid vocabulary.
hahaha

I'm almost down too your level... but I

To, not too.

I don't think I'm capable of even imitating your level
of dimensia.

You're certainly not capable of spelling dementia, dumbass.

You suck Kavik.

You should quit sucking your dog's dick, dumbass. He deserves better.

Pete Charest
Insult Yourself, I'm Busy