| Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS clothed! |
| From: Pete Charest |
| Date: 19/07/2003, 01:21 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:27:05 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:jheehv8h36o4tge8kcdh5dtaj42nf4ql8f@4ax.com...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:22:57 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sagan was just wrong. There is no such thing as
"extraordinary evidence" just as there is no such thing as "extraordinary
proof".
Here is where the profoundly stupid Kavik KangarooFucker Kang claims
that Carl Sagan was just wrong.
That's right, I do. I stand by the original statement, pasted below, too
which this thread is primarily a response.
You meant *to which*, but you misspelled it. Carl Sagan would not have
misspelled such a trivial and often-used phrase.
There is no such thing as "extraodrinary evidence". There is evidence and
there is conjecture. No claim requires a higher level of "proof" than any
other claim, "proof" is an absolute that is either achieved, or not,
through
the accumulation of evidence. "Extraordinanry evidence" is simply an
unatainable goal and a debunker ploy. There is no such thing as
"extraordinary evidence" just as there is no such thing as "extraordinary
proof".
In my opinion, Carl Sagan was wrong for the above reasons.
That's because your brainpower is limited and not capable of
understandingn the above statements. You are a dumbass, plain and
simple. You can't hide it. It shows in every post you make, dipshit.
hahaha...how many critically acclaimed science-for-laymen books have
you authored that have been made into long-running PBS television
series?
None, what relevance does it have?
Plenty. It speaks for his relevance to many thousands, nay millions,
of people.
How many games has Carl Sagan designed? I
Games? How many games have you designed that any one other than
yourself has ever heard of? You are a self-important dumb shit.
One thing I am pretty
sure of though, is that his response would not have resembled yours in any
way.
Of course not. He was polite to all people. I am only polite to people
who are not Kooks like you, dipshit.
Kangaroo...you are a profoundly stupid dipshit. Shut the fuck up,
please.
If I were profoundly stupid you would not be replying too my posts.
Again, you misuse the word too, showing once again just how profoundly
stupid you really are.
haha...laughing at you, dumbass.
Pete Charest
Insult Yourself, I'm Busy