Subject: Re: More naked skepticism
From: mbiggs@ihug.co.nz (Michael Biggs)
Date: 21/07/2003, 04:02
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks

"Kavik Kang the total moron wrote:"


(Yet more steaming shite snipped)

Your basic premis is wrong. I am not comparing the great wall and UFOs. All
I have done is applied the exact same evidential criteria to the great wall
as is demanded for UFOs. Nothing more. When this is done, no evidence has
yet been presented for the great wall, and it's been over a decade since I
first thought of this. 

But if we all know the Great Wall exists then we obviously wouldn't
apply the same criteria as we would for UFOs cos we don't know if UFOs
(or should I say alien spacecraft with little green aliens aboard that
like to turn up and give kooks anal probings, cut the lips and rectums
from cattle and crash all the time but strangely leave no evidence
whatsoever) exist no matter what all your kooky supporters....
Garrrry, Roberta et al claim. Would we you stupid kook.

The relevance is obvious, and I believe most rational
serious-minded students of science would agree that this is valid...

I believe ALL rational serious-minded students of science would agree
that you are a feeble minded kook with no basic understanding of the
basics of life let alone Occams Razor or anything else that requires
brain cells.


Mike