| Subject: Re: More naked skepticism |
| From: mbiggs@ihug.co.nz (Michael Biggs) |
| Date: 21/07/2003, 04:38 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks |
"Kavik Kang the toatal moron said:
(Tons of bullshit snipped)
There is no reason to avoid the great wall debate, although that has been
the general response from the very beginning, other than that, in the backs
of their minds at the very least, they know that this is proof that their
evidencial standards are flawed in some way. Notice that I do not attempt to
identify the flaw,
The flaws are obviously
there, since no evidence can be presented for the great wall by those
standards. You people constantly drone on and on about it
So, as you have no doubt said almost a million times in the past, show me
the evidence.
Of course you don't try and identify the flaws due to the fact there
aren't any flaws you dipshit. Even if there were flaws you'd be way
too dumb to spot them. That's proven by the fact that you can't spot
the flaws in YOUR argument.
Skepticism is based on the claimants backing up their claim with
irrefutable evidence of there being real UFOs visiting earth. This
they have failed to do, in fact they have never even come close
despite their claims. Proving the Great Wall is easy, you just go
there and stand on it just like miilions of others. Can you go and
stand on a flying saucer you brainless kook??? No you can't because
you can't find one and nor can any of your clueless mates who wave
their arms about making absurd claims. Your complete lack of ability
to follow a simple line of reasoning is total. I suggest you wander
to the corner of the classroom and put that pointy hat back on, it
might help keep that lonely braincell in your head just a little bit
warmer.
it is my hope that a real scientist type (they read this
stuff now and then) will someday see this and explain, in detail, exactly
where all the flaws in this type of "science" are.
Well you're gonna be hoping for a long time then aren't you Bucko cos
if there were flaws then the scientists would have picked them up cos
they'd be so easy to spot. But they haven't cos there aren't any.
The only flaws are the ones in you and your kooky buddies arguments
except to call them flaws is an understatement. Gaping chasms would
be closer to it.
Maybe scientists do look at this stuff occasionally....mainly to have
a laugh at clueless fucks like you that have no grip on reality.
That's why I'm here. You're better than any current comedy.
, but when the
tables are turned you become the very thing you claim to despise so much.
But the tables haven't been turned, you just think they have cos
you're retarded shithead. You can blather on all you want about not
talking about UFOs but we all know you are a believer so that puts you
in Twonkys, Garrrrrys, Robertas and even perhaps Holeflaffers
league.......a gullible sadarse with no life. Besides, we don't
despise anything, we just have a laugh at your expense but you're to
dumb to realise it.
Mike