| Subject: Re: More naked skepticism |
| From: "Robert Wolfe" <no-need@for.email.org> |
| Date: 21/07/2003, 14:04 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks |
"Michael "inspired latent homo?" Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:96b3cb92.0307201955.1350a41f@posting.google.com...
Roberta Wolfe said in response to Kavik the morons rant:
You may well have started the most thought provoking thread in these
NG's in
the last 3 years, so hopefully that should inspire something.
Maybe?
Inspire bowel movements and nausea, that's two things. Nothing
thought provoking though apart from you and your kooky mates actually
believing Kaviks tortured rants.
Interpreting such logic requires no "belief". I do not understand why you
think it does.
What's so thought provoking about the
claim that you should apply the same reasoning for the existence of a
massive solid object that is thousands of years old and that tens of
millions of people have walked on, to the fevered imaginationn of a
bunch of mentally challenged individuals who make up absurd claims
without one little dollop of evidence.
All your questions end with a period, k0ok? Also, I see no claim being made
by Kavik. He is asking *you* to prove your claim of a Great Wall, which you
are incapable of doing. Why is that?
What is so thought provoking about the thread, is that k0oks raise the bar
for acceptable evidence beyond what would be sufficient to prove that there
*is* a massive solid object that is *billions* of years old that billions of
people have walked upon. If you can't see the absurdity of accepting the
assumption that "people lie sometimes" so it follows that all anomalous
reports are lies" as valid logic that remotely "proves" anything, then
there's surely a short bus on its way to pick you up soon, and I surely
wouldn't have time to explain it to you.
Any kookfart from one of your
lot and you all start flapping like headless chooks.
Unlike your inane reponse, right?
If you morons are so confident in your brilliant findings why don't
you take your thesis to some reputable scientists.
Was that a question, k0ok? Nobody is caliming to have "found" anything
except a logical flaw in the massive denial of observations without any good
reason.
Warning though,
be prepared to get thrown out of the building to the sounds of
laughter.
Sure thing, k0ok.