"Michael Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in
message
news:96b3cb92.0307201955.1350a41f@posting.google.com...

Roberta Wolfe said in response to Kavik the

morons rant:

You may well have started the most thought

provoking thread in these NG's in

the last 3 years, so hopefully that should

inspire something.

Maybe?

Inspire bowel movements and nausea, that's two

things.  Nothing

thought provoking though apart from you and your

kooky mates actually

believing Kaviks tortured rants. What's so

thought provoking about the

claim that you should apply the same reasoning

for the existence of a

massive solid object that is thousands of years

old and that tens of

millions of people have walked on, to the

fevered imaginationn of a

bunch of mentally challenged individuals who

make up absurd claims

without one little dollop of evidence.   Any

kookfart from one of your

lot and you all start flapping like headless

chooks.

If you morons are so confident in your brilliant

findings why don't

you take your thesis to some reputable

scientists.   Warning though,

be prepared to get thrown out of the building to

the sounds of

laughter.

I think you are wasting your time but nice try
anyway.  What Kong doesn't understand about
science will fill numerous volumes.  In real
science a repeated experiment is what it takes to
prove something.  If you go to the Great Wall and
see that it is there and others go to the Great
Wall and see that it is there then it is.  Kong
was offered a free trip to visit the Great Wall
but declined because no evidence was forthcoming
first that it existed.  The only exception was
that he show one of his alien spaceships.  When a
persons mind is so screwed up that he has to have
proof of something before he will look at it for
verification then something is very wrong with
him.  If you notice, Kong has shown what it takes
to be a "debunker" it is identical with the actual
ravings of the alien spaceship "woo woo".

Have a nice week.

Harry