"Michael Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:96b3cb92.0307201955.1350a41f@posting.google.com...

Inspire bowel movements and nausea, that's two things.  Nothing
thought provoking though apart from you and your kooky mates actually
believing Kaviks tortured rants.

If that were true, you wouldn't feel a need to respond.

What's so thought provoking about the
claim that you should apply the same reasoning for the existence of a
massive solid object that is thousands of years old

Do you have any evidence for this claim?

and that tens of
millions of people have walked on,

Are you one of these people (an "experiencer") or are you talking about
annecdotal evidence?

to the fevered imaginationn of a
bunch of mentally challenged individuals who make up absurd claims
without one little dollop of evidence.

Sounds like you and this wall too me. If presenting evidence is as simple as
you seem too be implying, why don't you just do that and end this. It really
should be a simple thing to do, since you seem so certain that it exists.

Any kookfart from one of your
lot and you all start flapping like headless chooks.
If you morons are so confident in your brilliant findings why don't
you take your thesis to some reputable scientists.

I'd love too, send them on over! A reputable scientist would be a
reasonable, rational person. I would like nothing more than for those types
of people to come here and discuss the Great Wall with me.

Warning though,
be prepared to get thrown out of the building to the sounds of
laughter.

Actually, I'd expect a little better from real scientists than is normal
from the pseudo-scientists too be found around here.