Subject: Re: More naked skepticism
From: "Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com>
Date: 21/07/2003, 20:46
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks

"Michael Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:96b3cb92.0307201902.50b048c8@posting.google.com...
"Kavik Kang the total moron wrote:"
But if we all know the Great Wall exists then we obviously wouldn't
apply the same criteria as we would for UFOs cos we don't know if UFOs
(or should I say alien spacecraft with little green aliens aboard that
like to turn up and give kooks anal probings, cut the lips and rectums
from cattle and crash all the time but strangely leave no evidence
whatsoever) exist no matter what all your kooky supporters....
Garrrry, Roberta et al claim. Would we you stupid kook.

I knew the wall existed before I decided to take up that wonderful tool of
science known as debunkery. Haven't been able to find it since then. We
don't all know the great wall exists, I used too, but now I can't find any
evidence at all for it. Are you claiming that the fact that it is "common
knowledge" is valid proof? If so, I've got some bad news for you.


The relevance is obvious, and I believe most rational
serious-minded students of science would agree that this is valid...

I believe ALL rational serious-minded students of science would agree
that you are a feeble minded kook with no basic understanding of the
basics of life let alone Occams Razor or anything else that requires
brain cells.

So... you speak for everyone. I guess that discredits everything you say,
right?