"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:obnfhvg6sjkkcm3dth2edo7ch7vq14tkuq@4ax.com...

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:14:28 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:

that seems too be a false claim too me. You really are

You should have used the word to instead of too.

I believe you should have provided evidence for your claim, Kook.

That shows how stupid you are.

That's how Kooky you are.

[Which way do you think he'll go? Does anyone expect to find a truely

I think you meant truly, fuckhead.

Nope, I meant truely, I misspelled it just for you to give you yet another
opportunity to damage your credibility. Thanks for taking it again. You
really are an idiot.

I'm not kidding, either, I
intentionally don't use the spell checker just for nutcases like you.

I believe you. It doesn't have any bearing on how stupid you are and
how poorly you spell. You are a dumbass, plain and simple.

No, it has bearing on you grasping at straws to attack people for not
pushing the spell check button, like you do.

I intentionally don't use it, just to give morons like you the oppotunity to
hang themselves. Thanks for taking it, who is stupid?

Oh, by the way, you claimed that spelling is a direct indicator of
intelligence and refused to provide any evidence to support your claim
(which I happen to know is wrong). You are, therefore, by your own
standards, a Kook. I, on the other hand, by your standards, am not.

Thanks for playing.