In alt.alien.visitors Harry <hbosch@charter.net> wrote:

: "Michael Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in
: message
: news:96b3cb92.0307201955.1350a41f@posting.google.com...
:> Roberta Wolfe said in response to Kavik the
: morons rant:
:>
:>
:> >
:> > You may well have started the most thought
: provoking thread in these NG's in
:> > the last 3 years, so hopefully that should
: inspire something.
:> > Maybe?
:>
:> Inspire bowel movements and nausea, that's two
: things.  Nothing
:> thought provoking though apart from you and your
: kooky mates actually
:> believing Kaviks tortured rants. What's so
: thought provoking about the
:> claim that you should apply the same reasoning
: for the existence of a
:> massive solid object that is thousands of years
: old and that tens of
:> millions of people have walked on, to the
: fevered imaginationn of a
:> bunch of mentally challenged individuals who
: make up absurd claims
:> without one little dollop of evidence.   Any
: kookfart from one of your
:> lot and you all start flapping like headless
: chooks.
:> If you morons are so confident in your brilliant
: findings why don't
:> you take your thesis to some reputable
: scientists.   Warning though,
:> be prepared to get thrown out of the building to
: the sounds of
:> laughter.

: I think you are wasting your time but nice try
: anyway.  What Kong doesn't understand about
: science will fill numerous volumes.  In real
: science a repeated experiment is what it takes to
: prove something.  If you go to the Great Wall and
: see that it is there and others go to the Great
: Wall and see that it is there then it is.  Kong
: was offered a free trip to visit the Great Wall
: but declined because no evidence was forthcoming
: first that it existed.  The only exception was
: that he show one of his alien spaceships.  When a
: persons mind is so screwed up that he has to have
: proof of something before he will look at it for
: verification then something is very wrong with
: him.  If you notice, Kong has shown what it takes
: to be a "debunker" it is identical with the actual
: ravings of the alien spaceship "woo woo".

But if you go to a natural formation that appears to be manmade, and assume
it is, how do you prove that it is anything other than a natural rock outcrop
that *appears* to be artificial. . .like the Bimini Road. . .
http://www.subversiveelement.com/BiminiRoad.html

Garry 

: Have a nice week.

: Harry