| Subject: Re: More naked skepticism |
| From: Pete Charest |
| Date: 22/07/2003, 00:55 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 21:36:54 +0000 (UTC), Garry Bryan
<garry@soco.agilent.com> wrote:
But if you go to a natural formation that appears to be manmade, and assume
it is, how do you prove that it is anything other than a natural rock outcrop
that *appears* to be artificial. . .like the Bimini Road. . .
Forget it, Garrrrry. You should leave such complex things to people
who haven't ruined their brains with drugs and conspiracy bullshit.
Pete Charest
Insult Yourself, I'm Busy