On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:26:32 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:obnfhvg6sjkkcm3dth2edo7ch7vq14tkuq@4ax.com...

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:14:28 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:

that seems too be a false claim too me. You really are

You should have used the word to instead of too.

I believe you should have provided evidence for your claim, Kook.

What claim is that, Kongo?

That shows how stupid you are.

That's how Kooky you are.

Clever too, or is it to?

[Which way do you think he'll go? Does anyone expect to find a truely

I think you meant truly, fuckhead.

Nope, I meant truely, I misspelled it

You misspelled it...on purpose?  bwahahahaha...
You are profoundly stupid if you think anyone will believe that line
of bullshit.

just for you to give you yet another
opportunity to damage your credibility.

Fixing your atrocious spelling damages MY credibility?

hahaha...KongoBoy...you really are reaching, dipshit.

Oh, by the way, you claimed that spelling is a direct indicator of
intelligence and refused to provide any evidence to support your claim

I don't have to supply any evidence, because every post of yours is
filled with exactly that evidence. Your posts prove that poor spelling
is at least in your case, linked directly to low intelligence and
rationality.

Thanks for proving my point.

(which I happen to know is wrong).

Yes you prove it right, every time you open your profoundly stupid
mouth.


Pete Charest
Insult Yourself, I'm Busy