In alt.alien.visitors Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: Notorious net kook and utter ignoramus Garrrry "Always Wrong" 
: Bryan wrote:

:> In alt.alien.visitors Michael Biggs <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
:> : "Kavik Kang the total moron wrote:"
:> 
:> 
:> : (Yet more steaming shite snipped)
:> :> 
:> :> Your basic premis is wrong. I am not comparing the great wall and UFOs. All
:> :> I have done is applied the exact same evidential criteria to the great wall
:> :> as is demanded for UFOs. Nothing more. When this is done, no evidence has
:> :> yet been presented for the great wall, and it's been over a decade since I
:> :> first thought of this. 
:> 
:> : But if we all know the Great Wall exists then we obviously wouldn't
:> : apply the same criteria as we would for UFOs cos we don't know if UFOs
:> : (or should I say alien spacecraft with little green aliens aboard that
:> : like to turn up and give kooks anal probings, cut the lips and rectums
:> : from cattle and crash all the time but strangely leave no evidence
:> : whatsoever) exist no matter what all your kooky supporters....
:> : Garrrry, Roberta et al claim. Would we you stupid kook.
:> 
:> But whatever evidence of a UFO close encounter is presented; radiation, ground
:> traces, collected liquids, etc. it is dismissed as not "extraordinary". . .

: That's because there never is any real radiation, the so-called 
: ground "traces" could have been made any number of mundane ways, 
: and the alleged liquids turn out to be either myth, or nothing 
: special. So yes, nothing extraordinary here.

:> we have all grown up hearing and reading about the Great Wall, but I was never
:> given any evidence. . .knid of like Mikey with Sunday school, they talked up 
:> a good story but he didn't buy it. . .

: The difference is, the Great Wall is not a matter of faith, unlike 
: religion and UFOism.

Then it should be no problem to provide proof of it, correct? Why do you 
refrain from doing what you ask of others? Could it be your real agenda doesn't
allow you to play by the same rules. . .

Garry