"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3b375048c2d05f68b1236069e3f584e3@news.meganetnews.com...

The up and coming net kook known as Kavik Kang wrote:

"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:bfbl0a$88p$1@slb5.atl.mindspring.net...

Harry wrote:

I think you are wasting your time.  Kong can't
even keep straight who or which post he is
replying to.

Yeah, he's pretty useless and pathetic. But at least he is fun to
bat around. That's about all kooks like him are good for.

Ah, the old "talk about him between ourselves so we can say anything".

Now you are just whining, Kang. Grow up a little bit, or get out
of the kitchen if you can't take the heat.

I am not "whining" about anything. That is just yet another one of your
twisted little games. You are simply using a loaded word, which in reality
applies in no way (show one example of me "whining") in an attempt to form
an inaccurate vision of me in the minds of readers. This tactic normally
works well, unless of course the target points it out as I have. Show one
example of me whining, you can't because there aren't any. It's just another
one of your debunker tactics.

Not
bad, and potentially psychologically powerful depending upon the

personality

of the reader. Of course, Mike is the only one getting "batted around",

Delusion noted.

Your delusion noted, none exists on my part.

having his tactics exposed daily (remember the thing he keeps clipping

out

of the other thread that I keep putting back in, that's just one

example),

and having lots of tough questions asked of him that he avoids or

ignores

through snipping. If there's any "batting around" going on here, you are

the

batee.

Ah, the old "talk about him in third-person to the voices in your
head" tactic, eh?

I was talking to the audience, as I have been off and on from the beginning,
and as I am about too as the response to your next lame attempt to label me
a kopok below.

Keep trying to prove you aren't a kook, Kang. Every time you do,
you just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper.

You are the only one who is diggin a hole for himself, and it's all right
back in this thread for anyone too see.

Ok, so here he goes with moving from attempting to label me a kook with no
cause at all to attempting to portray it as though it has been proven that I
am a kook and it is now up too me to prove that I am not. Of course, anyone
who has been following this thread knows how rediculous this is. His attempt
here to transition into "he is a well-established, proven kook" is pathetic
in this case because this entire thread shows that, if anything, he is a
kook. His tactics are obvious and transparent, and many are noted throughout
this thread. Simply read back through this thread and you will see that this
is accurate.