"Michael Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:96b3cb92.0307220211.4f7196be@posting.google.com...

"Kavik Kang the 'Skeptic'   BWAHAHAHAHA wrote

Nothing worth repeating.
Well not recently but 6 years ago he came up with a pearler.
Sorry for top posting but this is a real hoot!!!

Yes, it is. I actually responed to this above where you had re-pasted the
whole thing in another post, but let's see what else is in this one...

All messages from thread
Message 1 in thread
From: Kavik Kang (kang@dimensional.com)
Subject: Roswell Material and the Media


View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors, alt.paranet.ufo
Date: 1997/07/16


     Hello everyone,
     For years it has been said that once there was hard, physical
evidence
that "the whole world would be talking about it".  That it would be a
huge
story, that it wouldn't be treated like the other evidence is treated
(with
ridicule and debunker's games).  Now we know that isn't true.  On July
4th,
the announcement that there seroiusly might be that "Holy Grail" was
made.
It hasn't received any appreciable media coverage, and doesn't appear
that
it will any time soon.  When will the majority of people hear about
it?

[Snipped re-pasted message body other than first paragraph for regognition
purposes]

 And then in his second post:
From: Marc Michalik (kang@dimensional.com)
Subject: Re: Roswell Material and the Media


View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors, alt.paranet.ufo
Date: 1997/07/16


Oops, forgot to change my handle when I posted.  This is Marc
Michalik,
"Kavik Kang" is my net-handle.  Sorry about that:-)

-- 
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice." -- Neil
Peart

What exactly is my great crime in this second post? That I had forgot to
give any indication of who I was in the original post so I posted one after
it to identify myself? I don't get what it is that you are even
misinterpreting here.

Awwwww Kavik (or Marc), you didn't mention your consuming interest in
Roswell before.

What consuming interest? This had almost nothing to do with Roswell, it was
about material someone had found that nobody could initially explain. These
posts you are grabbing are from within days of the initial announcement. I
never mentioned a consuming interest in Roswell because I don't have one.

It's certainly eye opening.

It sure is, you either have horrible reading comprehension and or are
reading things into this that you either assume are there, or you need them
to be there so badly you are seeing things that aren't there.

You're a skeptic are
you???

I am skeptical by nature, although I take the proponent side of the UFO
debate for very specific reasons. I have explained why in more detail in the
past, and will again here now when the time is right.

Suuuure Kavik (or Marc).  I'll dissect this message in my
next post but in the meantime it's worth reading in its
entirety.............right Kavik (or Marc)????
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I can't wait for you to disect this message, since there is nothing at all
damning contained in it...