"Michael Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:96b3cb92.0307221140.59570805@posting.google.com...
"Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<EXVSa.112808$ye4.83858@sccrnsc01>...
"Michael Biggs" <mbiggs@ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
news:96b3cb92.0307201955.1350a41f@posting.google.com...
Inspire bowel movements and nausea, that's two things. Nothing
thought provoking though apart from you and your kooky mates actually
believing Kaviks tortured rants.
If that were true, you wouldn't feel a need to respond.
But I enjoy responding to full blown rabid kooks.
No, it's what I orignally said. But as far as the rabid kook thing, me too.
I've found mine, have you found any yet?
What's so thought provoking about the
claim that you should apply the same reasoning for the existence of a
massive solid object that is thousands of years old
Do you have any evidence for this claim?
Do you have any evidence that you're not a saucerhead?? Cos we have
plenty of evidence that you are.
Really, where? I haven't seen any evidence of that you, just raving lunatics
repeating it over and over because they need it to stick too me so badly.
Notice I didn't say they need it to be true, they could care less about
that, they just have a need for it to stick. Which has should be very
obvious by now to anyone following along.
And you never provided any evidence for your claim. If it's such a simple
matter, why not just do it? Why go through all this nonsense when all you
have to do to make me shut up and go away forever is show me ANY EVIDENCE AT
ALL for this wacky wall of yours? Obviously, everything you say other than
providing evidence for the great wall, is simply an attempt at diverting
attention away from the great wall, and the obvious fact that not you or
anyone else is capable of providing me with any evidence for the great wall.
If you are, just do it. Don't talk about how stupid I am, how much of a kook
I am, or little I know about science, that is all totally irrelivant. Just
any evidence at all for the great wall and you win and it's over. What is
the problem?
and that tens of
millions of people have walked on,
Are you one of these people (an "experiencer") or are you talking about
annecdotal evidence?
I walked on it. So back to the question, have you walked on a flying
saucer??
If I said yes, would you consider that valid evidence of the existance of
aliens and their craft? You having walked on the great wall is a nice story,
but it's just a story. Are you saying that now andecdotal evidence *is*
considered evidence? That flies in the face of 40 years of that valuable
"tool of science" known as debunkery... Are you sure about this?
to the fevered imaginationn of a
bunch of mentally challenged individuals who make up absurd claims
without one little dollop of evidence.
Sounds like you and this wall too me. If presenting evidence is as
simple as
you seem too be implying, why don't you just do that and end this. It
really
should be a simple thing to do, since you seem so certain that it
exists.
We don't need evidence Kavik (or Marc) Look at the bottom of the
thread. We have people watching you. And laughing.
Uh oh, he has people watching me, hahaha. And I am the Kook, haha. You just
said the kookiest thing, I could shred you for it by imitating what a
debunkers response might be. That would go something like this "OOOhhh, he's
got people watching me. Apparently he now believes that he is part of some
type of secret orginization who monitors evil people like me." But, as a
normal and rational person I will simply say that I will respond to people
further down in the thread when I get too them.
Now, your first statement is faaaaaar more interesting. I am very
intertested in understanding why you said "we don't need evidence". Are you
saying that you are so superior that your statements should simply be taken
as gods law? I would really like to see you explain that comment, it's such
an intersting statement coming from a "guardian of science" such as
yourself. Please explaine why you don't need to provide any evidence to
support your claims, and everyone else does, and how you are not a kook
while holding that belief.
Any kookfart from one of your
lot and you all start flapping like headless chooks.
If you morons are so confident in your brilliant findings why don't
you take your thesis to some reputable scientists.
I'd love too, send them on over! A reputable scientist would be a
reasonable, rational person. I would like nothing more than for those
types
of people to come here and discuss the Great Wall with me.
A reputable scientist wouldn't come within mile of you kook. My 1
year old baby daughter could run rings around you logically.
Then why are you having so much trouble with it? Everyone note that his
response was entirely crafted to make himself feel superior as he wrote it,
the whole reason he is here.
Actually, reputable scientists used to hang out here and post quite a bit.
The main reason I don't come here often any more is because they are all
gone, they were the people worth talking too, that you could actually have a
conversation with. They did a lot more than come within a mile of me, I was
actually quite popular with them as UFO proponents go. It was there kind
that started calling me things like "The Rational Proponent" and "The Teflon
Believer"... so try again.
Warning though,
be prepared to get thrown out of the building to the sounds of
laughter.
Actually, I'd expect a little better from real scientists than is normal
from the pseudo-scientists too be found around here.
Read below, Marc Michalik the mentally challenged foaming at the mouth
koo reveals himself.
Hey, trying to bring back a version of "Foaming True Believer" and apply it
too me... you aren't such a newbie after all:-) Words with a powerful
psychological impact are always helpful in your little game.
From: Marc Michalik (kang@dimensional.com)
Subject: Re: Roswell Material and the Media
View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors, alt.paranet.ufo
Date: 1997/07/16
Oops, forgot to change my handle when I posted. This is Marc
Michalik,
"Kavik Kang" is my net-handle. Sorry about that:-)
--
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice." -- Neil
Peart
The intl society of kooks have welcomed you aboard.
I doubt it, but they're probably starting to taylor a uniform too your size
after this nonsense. Did you actually read what I wrote? It seems like you
just skimmed it and assumed what it said. I think maybe you better read it,
because there is nothing even remotely "kooky" in it. You might as well put
up a recepie for your mother's chicken soup and exclaim "Ah ha!!! I have you
now!"
What you have accomplished, however, is to provide an excellent example of
the true goal of a debunker, which is to label the subject "a kooky nutcase"
any way you can. Look at what he did. I mentioned in my last round of posts
that I had discussed UFOs in the past, and that those posts were archived. I
didn't say that just to the person I was talking too, I said that praying
that one of them would go do exactly what Brigg's did. He took the time too
go searching through my old posts for some straw to grab at. While there, he
couldn't help but read through post after post of rational, often skeptical,
opinions and statements. Wading through all that, this was the best
ammunition he could find to use... and there is nothing in it!!! Nothing,
that is, other than the same exact position that many skeptics were taking
at the time, days after this was announced, "this is very interesting, I
can't wait for the tests". What is so kooky about that? Nothing, but he's
right, this post is about as kooky as I get, that's why it was the best he
could find. I consider this too be strong evidence that I am NOT a kook, as
if I need any more than is contained in these very threads. The truly
telling thing here is how he has posted and reposted it in glee, you can
almost see him jumping up and down with excitement, because he thinks he has
won his twisted little game... He thinks he has satisfied his need to feel
superior too me. Thanks Briggs, you've done some great work for me here:-)
Many of these guys are now approaching a certain level of obssession with
me. Ask yourself, why?
When are you
Garrrry, Roberta etc gonna get together to froth over all your
'conclusive evidence'???
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Never, since I haven't used that phrase.