"Robert Wolfe" <me@example.com> wrote in message
news:9f2895cae9908c3d7468e7545ce32c38@free.teranews.com...

 > : Sure. But why bother? Only a kook would make such a demand.

Touche:

Only a k0ok would refuse to support their claim so nonchalantly, as you
have just done.

"Why Bother?"  ...I'll assume you consider that to be a logical and
acceptable response to your inane requests for "absolute proof" of
"unidentified areal phenomena", then.

...And the rest of you can take this as evidence that I am not speaking to
an imaginary audience, as Mike keeps insisting. You can also take this as
evidence that I am actually accomplishing something, which is very
important. It speaks to the rationality of what I am doing. Robert here has
learned some new concepts in discussing the subject, and here he is applying
them. Just one of the many signs I see every time I do this that tells me
that A) I am not speaking to an imaginary audience and, B) People are
learning new, applicable concepts from the Great Great Wall debate. That
second point is very important with all these attacks toward me trying to
get that kook label to stick. The fact that what I am doing achieves real,
observable results goes a long way toward vindicating my methods.