| Subject: Re: More naked skepticism |
| From: "Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 24/07/2003, 19:44 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks |
"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:p6jvhvsmic9cobfvd4pispnu6p1q1je8rf@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:42:21 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:
[Ok, folks, here's the deal on Mr. Superior here. No matter how much he
screams and yells about how superior he is (the only reason he is here),
that doesn't change the fact that he really is a rank amature.
My superiority to you needs only your pathetic strained logic and
delusional mindset for its display. Oh and by the way, you are the
amateur, (note correct spelling, dipshit).
Wow, you are just plain masochistic. You've actually come back for more.
Well, ok, everyone above we have Pete providing us with more evidence that
his kind are only here to satisfy their pathetic need to feel superior to
someone.
(which I happen to know is wrong).
Yes you prove it right, every time you open your profoundly stupid
mouth.
Actually this was about spelling and grammar being indicators of low
intelligence and nothing to do with me. Your obssession seems to be
growing.
Obsession seems your specialty there are hardly any people more
profoundly stupid and rampantly illogical than you.
Being stupid is like a badge of honor for you, isn't it?
No, but I'm still trying to figure out what it is that you are even
attacking me for. I have no obssessio, but you are quite obviously obssessed
with me. We weren't even in a conversation, you just came out of the blue
and you are still at it.
[Notice how I am the only subject he has ever discussed in my threads. His
only interest is in me.]
Notice also that this was his second chance to respond to what is again
pasted below, he clipped it all with no mention and replaced it with this
pathetic display of his mental disorder. Here, again, is your claim that you
must provide evidence for to remove that kook label that you earned by your
own standards.
"> Your spelling is a good measure of your intellect. You are a dumbass
and it shows every post.
Oh reeeaalllyyy... You are really bad at this game. You just made a claim,
bad move...
I would like to see research indicating that spelling is a good measure of
your intellect. You have made an unsupported claim that, unless you back it
up with evidence, by your standards, you are a "kook". Those are your
standards, not mine."
So, that is what his post here was a response too, in other words, this is
what he was avoiding and attempting to defelct attention from when he made
this post.
Where is your evidence for your claim, kook?