| Subject: Kang *still* in denial bout being a kook |
| From: Michael Davis |
| Date: 25/07/2003, 03:10 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks |
The up and coming net kook known as Kavik Kang wrote:
"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:75f61d49f92eb82593ee750bc418e46d@news.meganetnews.com...
The up and coming net kook known as Kavik Kang wrote:
[I will be snipping great portions of this mess to clean it back into a
usable state.
Liar. How come your response is about four times longer than my
post if you "snipped it back to a usable state? This post must be
upwards of a thousand lines. The reason it grew into an
unmanageable monster is your kooky obsession with responding to
every sentence I write with a couple of paragraphs of kooky
commentary aimed at some imaginary audience. (Is there a name for
that sort lunacy?)
Pay attention and learn something. I'll show you how to snip a
post down to size.
Snip many instances of Kang whining about me to an imaginary audience.
Snip Kang lying about who made this thread unreadable.
Snip Kang associating with kooks then complaining about being a
victim of "guilt by association."
Snip Kang claiming his threads are always the most popular ones in
the NG.
Snip Kang admitting to holding on to the same logical fallacy for
20 years.
Snip Kang admitting to having all the kook traits I accuse him of,
but then in a masterpiece of denial, claiming it still doesn't
prove he is a kook.
Snip Kang several times denying that we are having a
conversation????? (That one is a real head scratcher.)
Snip Kang being deliberately obtuse.
Snip many instances of Kang claiming to speak for everyone.
Snip Kang claiming to only be acting stupid.
Snip Kang still whining about other posters.
Snip Kang
*still* claiming to be smarter than Sagen, but now
couching it in some lame kookery about attacking his words, but
not the man.
Snip Kang absurdly claiming that the same criteria for evidence I
have used for many years was just made up a few days ago. (Ever
heard of google?)
Snip yet more of Kang's usual attempts to shift the burden of
proof onto skeptics.
Whew, that's better. Doop! Nothing left.
Hey, Kang. Just for shits and giggles, why don't you try posting
something on topic for a change. I have seen a bit of your past
posting history. Apparently you can do it if you really want to.
It was laughably stupid and amazingly kooky, but at least it was
on topic.
--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://mdavis19.tripod.com
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often
erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)