| Subject: Re: All about Naked skepticism//Average Debunker described as 'cretin. ignorant' by ignorant cretin |
| From: David Patrick |
| Date: 25/07/2003, 20:33 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:15:21 GMT, Sir Artio <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
In article <cvm0iv0knia9ook826m5s752dr49sqb7m5@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...
So where did you get your qualifications...
Patty, rest assured that I OUT-qualify you on this topic.
Ah, this is an example of one of those Debunker Rules you always
cut-n-paste:
4. Do your research by proclamation, rather than investigation. It is much
easier.
Simply proclaiming you are more qualified is a no no, by your rules.
Prove you are better qualified. Where did you get your doctorate? In
what field? How many UFO cases have you personally investigated? Will
you post a sample report you yourself have reposted?
You refuse to answer any of those? Then you have failed to show
yourself to be more qualified than me.
David Patrick