| Subject: Re: Kang *still* in denial bout being a kook |
| From: Garry Bryan |
| Date: 25/07/2003, 17:09 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks |
In alt.alien.visitors Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: The up and coming net kook known as Kavik Kang wrote:
:> "Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
:> news:75f61d49f92eb82593ee750bc418e46d@news.meganetnews.com...
:>
:>>The up and coming net kook known as Kavik Kang wrote:
:>
:>
:> [I will be snipping great portions of this mess to clean it back into a
:> usable state.
: Liar. How come your response is about four times longer than my
: post if you "snipped it back to a usable state? This post must be
: upwards of a thousand lines. The reason it grew into an
: unmanageable monster is your kooky obsession with responding to
: every sentence I write with a couple of paragraphs of kooky
: commentary aimed at some imaginary audience. (Is there a name for
: that sort lunacy?)
: Pay attention and learn something. I'll show you how to snip a
: post down to size.
: Snip many instances of Kang whining about me to an imaginary audience.
Please provide evidence that Kang was 1) whining 2) doing it to an imaginary
audience? <my post negates the second post
: Snip Kang lying about who made this thread unreadable.
: Snip Kang associating with kooks then complaining about being a
: victim of "guilt by association."
Please provide evidence that Kang has associated with "kooks" other than you?
<He has not associated with me so you can't use this post as evidence>
: Snip Kang claiming his threads are always the most popular ones in
: the NG.
I will provide evidence that I think his posts are the most interesting and
well responded to on this NG for awhile.
: Snip Kang admitting to holding on to the same logical fallacy for
: 20 years.
Exposing debunking as a fallacy is logical. . .
: Snip Kang admitting to having all the kook traits I accuse him of,
: but then in a masterpiece of denial, claiming it still doesn't
: prove he is a kook.
But he has only exhibited debunker traits and restraint of a saint. . .hmmm,
guess that makes you a "kook" by association. . .
: Snip Kang several times denying that we are having a
: conversation????? (That one is a real head scratcher.)
There is never a conversation with you Mikey, it is a shitflinging match.
: Snip Kang being deliberately obtuse.
LOL!! Like you never exhibited those traits!!
: Snip many instances of Kang claiming to speak for everyone.
BAHAHAHAHA! Like all those times you speak for "everyone around here". . .
: Snip Kang claiming to only be acting stupid.
: Snip Kang still whining about other posters.
Like you never whine about me!!!
: Snip Kang *still* claiming to be smarter than Sagen, but now
: couching it in some lame kookery about attacking his words, but
: not the man.
Now who is being obtuse? He never claimed to be smarter than Sagen only that
he thought Sagans statement was stupid. . .but we know SAgen is a kook because
he believed in ET visitation. . .
"With the numbers we have discussed, it seems possible that the Earth has been visited by various Galactic civilizations many times (possibly 10 [every 10,000 years], during geological time.) It is not out of the question that artifacts of these visits still exist--although none have been found to date--or even that some kind of base is maintained within the solar system to provide continuity for successive expeditions. Because of weathering and the possibility of detection and interference by the inhabita
nts of the Earth, it might have appeared preferable not to erect such a base on the Earth's surface. "
: Snip Kang absurdly claiming that the same criteria for evidence I
: have used for many years was just made up a few days ago. (Ever
: heard of google?)
: Snip yet more of Kang's usual attempts to shift the burden of
: proof onto skeptics.
Well, where is the evidence for a Great Wall?
: Whew, that's better. Doop! Nothing left.
: Hey, Kang. Just for shits and giggles, why don't you try posting
: something on topic for a change. I have seen a bit of your past
: posting history. Apparently you can do it if you really want to.
: It was laughably stupid and amazingly kooky, but at least it was
: on topic.
Now I predict a response that will reveal Mikey's obssesive nature. . .
Garry