In article <q067ivc7ujjsm4es02tm361qq1kqii8dto@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...
And it doesn't have anything to do with UFOs or aliens either. This is
poor even for you, Flaffer.
Patty, you ignorant slug. If I say it's related, it is releated, period!!
Now don't question my authority again!! ALL MANKIND
are sick of debunkers, truth-terrorists, so-called skeptics
and traitors to the human race. So please leave now
or else the debunkers will be thrown into Camp
Fry-em-ALL which is run by Gen. Borman
Killemall. Get the idea, Patty!!
Boycott The Pentagon-Produced Film "Independence Day"/Learn the Facts NOW!
I strongly encourage everyone to avoid the Pentagon-produced film titled
"Independence Day!" This film does more harm than good in educating the
public about what is really happening with extraterrestrials. The movie's
REAL intended purpose is to justify the massive expenditures on the
military-industrial complex. To wit, the Pentagon plans to spend $1.6 trillion
over the next six years, more than the rest of the world combined, but yet
has no real enemy to rationalize that spending; hence a "new" enemy has
to be found and sold to the gullible public: the extraterrestrial!
There are so many flaws with the movie I will try to highlight only the major
ones:
1) ETs are one big happy family or the aliens are a monolithic lot.
Wrong! As we know from the many books and eye-witnesses concerning this
subject; ET's represent many races; such as the Greys, Reticulans, Nordics,
Zetas, the Praying-Mantis types, Reptilians, Pleiadians, Tans and the many
forms of human-alien hybrids. We know from the written material that
some ETs are as alien to each other as they are to us. Also, there are
so many E.T. agenda's going on concurrently, some in apparent cooperation
with each other, but some probably at odds with each other, as to make
the main story line impossible. Simple put, to suggest that there would
be one big alliance of ETs to destroy our planet Earth is utterly
implausible and total fiction (and not good science fiction, incidentally)
2) The E.T.s would wait until 1996 to attack Earth and then accomplish
a take-over of Earth with laser-beam weapons!
Wrong! Common sense would tell you that if an ET race WAS
bent on annihilating Earth's civilization, it would be ludicrous for them to
wait until 1996 AD, when humans could possibly inflict some casualties
on them. Any time prior to human's possessing modern weapons systems
(such as nuclear) would have been a much better time to exterminate or
dominate the human race. Plus, a couple of cobalt anti-matter bombs would do
the
trick anyway, or a fast-acting incurable virus, (which we know the ET's
possess!)
3) In reality the ALIENS have ALREADY invaded Earth. Yes, aliens
are already here. Anybody who has taken the time and done their own
investigative research has figured out that the ET's do not come from
their home planet every time they visit Earth, nor do they always fly
from their residence on the Moon and/or Mars. The facts are is that they
have elaborate underground bases all over the Globe, connected by an extensive
tunnel system. In addition, the ET's have already worked out their top-secret
deals with the super-secret-arm of the military/corporate entities
and the alphabet-soup intelligence agencies. Logically, what would be a
more effective and insidious way to invade Earth, by blasting your way with
beam-weapons, or by infiltrating the most secret financial and intelligence
groups?
And where better to have your base of operations than under the oceans
and in secret locations around the planet,?
4) Like the other no-brainier summer movie, "The Arrival" it is always the
one-man-alone scenario that saves the day and not a progressive, grass-roots
organization! This time it's Jeff Goldblum as the brilliant but under-achieving
cable TV technician-that has figured out about the secret alien transmissions,
and
not an organization that has been working for years to unravel the mystery,
such as MUFON, Operation Right To Know, or CSETI. Commercial movies
and their scum-bag producers hate progressive movements, which is why they
are never portrayed. (Furthermore, that is a great reason to boycott ALL
commercial movies and support your independently made films. A great
suggestion for those who love democracy, which I pray you all do!)
5) Don't buy into the military-saves-the-day routine. Although this idiotic
film suggest that the American-War machine can defeat ET's, that message is
an absurd and deceitful lie intended to justify the military's obscenely massive
budget. Yes, we are manipulated to believe that H-bombs (which the Pentagon
still claims that they can use without doing long-term massive environmental
damage to the entire planet) and jet fighters (F-18s) armed with air-to-air
missiles
can defeat an alien force which includes a 250 mile-long Mothership (which is
really a 30-foot model.) No mention about the TRUE global defense system
that has been built, installed and used against the ET's successfully. Those
include various SDI programs such as:
A) Project HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program)
which is a Tesla-based "Star-Wars" weapon which can be used to incapacitate
the planet, perhaps to make it inhospitable for the ETs. It's stated purpose
is to:
1) Disrupt human mental processes;
2) Jam all global communications systems;
3) Change weather patterns over large areas;
4) Interfere with wildlife migration patterns;
5) Negatively affects peoples health;
6) Unnaturally impact the Earth's upper atmosphere.
B) Plasmoid Weapons-A plasmoid is an extremely high-energy concentrated
force field that can tear anything apart. This incredible system directs two
very powerful energy beams: one consists of electromagnetic energy in the
microwave range, the other consists of intense laser energy. These beams
converge in space at a designated target (such as an Extraterrestrial craft) and
can be described as something like a miniature hydrogen bomb inside the
Superdome!
C) Particle-beam weapons.
D) Laser weapons- These "dated" weapons have been used to shoot down alien
crafts; as well as MASER weapons also. A MASER is a narrow-beam projection
system.
E) Electro-magnetic pulse weapons; such as Project ARIES - Advanced
Research Electromagnetic Pulse Simulator.
AIRES uses an advanced particle energy capability that can deliver a
100-trillion volt burst of ions using a lithium diode one inch thick. These
fusion-powered 100-trillion bolt blasts can overpower even the most
exotic extraterrestrial UFO technology. An explosion drives a generator
to emit an electromagnetic pulse that can destroy an alien ship.
F) Solar weapons-A heliostat (a solar collector-concentrator device) that can
burn through 1 inch thick metal plating in 26 seconds, or aimed at an alien
craft
can burn a hole through it or make it come crashing down. **BOOM**
G) Recovered alien-craft has also been reconfigured to attack incoming alien
craft.
There are dozens of alien-crafts now re-tooled at AREA-51, Nevada, and other
locations around the world, all set and ready to use.
H) Stealth technology,which is really multi-spectral invisibility, which can be
applied to any kind of jet or craft to make it truly invisible. It is also used
to
make people invisible when the need arises. The Secret-Service uses it's
invisibility capabilities to protect the President!
I) HPM- High-powered microwaves designed to neutralize even the most
advanced electronic system, disable or destroy electronically-dependent
weapons systems and shut down engines.
J) Infrasound- Projection of very-low frequency sound waves able to
disorient or otherwise dissuade aliens away from certain areas!
6) From the Defense Monitor:
* Most Americans agree that current military spending is too high. They would
support cutting military spending and retargeting the savings to other national
priorities, such as improving education, fighting crime, reducing the deficit
(brought on by massive amounts of military spending!), or even prudent tax cuts.
*Spending on costly and unneeded Cold War weapons programs continues
and will increase in the coming years. Total acquisition costs for new aircraft
and ballistic missile defenses alone could exceed $500 Billion!
*The United States can safely and sensibly reduce its annual military budget to
about $200 Billion (or much, much less) and continue to maintain the strongest
military forces in the world.
*Current plans call for military budgets totaling $1.6 TRILLION over the
next 6 years.
*The Defense Department has called a halt to post-Cold War reductions in
force levels and is pushing to greatly expand spending on expensive new
weapons. A dubious crisis of "modernization" has been proclaimed but
existing U.S. weapons are already superior and can be improved, maintained,
and remanufactured at much less cost than building exotic new weapons.
*Despite Administrations denials, the huge U.S. military establishment is
still primarily a tool to make America the world's policeman. This is an
insupportable burden rejected by most U.S. taxpayers.
*Military officials now proclaim a military strategy of "preventive defense,
" a vague and elastic goal that seeks to prevent the emergence of "potential"
threats.
This is a formula for endlessly expanding military budgets and meddling in the
affairs of other nations.
*America defense interests would be better served by a SUBSTANTIAL
REDUCTION in the size of the armed forces, linked to a national security
strategy of CONSTRUCTIVE engagement with potential adversaries and
greater recognition of the capacity of wealthy allies to look after their own
interests. The era of paternalistic US military welfare programs for
dependent nations should end!
Get the REAL facts from the Defense Monitor
http://www.cdi.org/
Facts about North Korea:
United States Gross National Product is $5.951 Trillion
North Korea's Gross National Product is $21 Billion
United States GNP is over 250 TIMES larger then North Korea
United States population is approx 255 million
North Koreas population is approx 22 million
United States has over 11 times as many people as North Korea
Military spending by U.S. -- $298 billion
Military spending by North Korea - $5 billion
Shortly after the close of the Second World War, the Soviet Union and the
United States occupied Korea in order to expel the defeated Japanese. A
demarcation line between the Russian and American forces was set up along
the 38th Parallel. The creation of this line in no way had the explicit or
implicit intention of establishing two separate countries, but the cold war was
soon to intrude.
Both powers insisted that unification of North and South was the principal and
desired goal. However, they also desired to see this carried out in their own
ideological image, and settled thereby into a routine of proposal and
counter-proposal, accusation and counter-accusation, generously intermixed
with deviousness, and produced nothing in the way of an agreement during the
ensuing years. Although both Moscow and Washington and their hand-picked
Korean leaders were not always displeased about the division of the country (on
the grounds that half a country was better than none), officials and citizens of
both sides continued to genuinely call for the unification on a regular basis.
That Korea was still one country, with unification still the goal, at the time
the
war began, was underscored by the chief US delegate to the UN, Warren Austin,
in a statement he made shortly afterwards:
"The artificial barrier which has divided North and South Korea has no basis
for existence either in law or in reason. Neither the United Nations, its
commission on Korea, nor the Republic of Korea (South Korea) recognize such
a line. Now the North Koreans, by armed attack upon the Republic of Korea
have denied the reality of any such line."
The two sides had been clashing across the Parallel for several years. What
happened on that fateful day in June could thus be regarded as no more than
the escalation of an ongoing civil war. The North Korean government has
claimed that in 1949 alone, the South Korean army or police perpetrated 2,617
armed incursions into the North to carry out murder, kidnapping, pillage and
arson for the purpose of causing social disorder and unrest, as well as to
increase the combat capabilities of the invaders. At times, stated the
Pyongyang government, thousands of soldiers were involved in a single battle
with may casualties resulting.
A State Department official, Ambassador-at-large Phillip C. Jessup, speaking in
April 1950, put it this way: "There is a constant fighting between the South
Korean Army and bands that infiltrate the country from the North. There are
very real battles, involving perhaps one or two thousand men. When you go to
this boundary, as I did...you see troop movements, fortifications, and
prisoners of war."
Seen in this context, the question of who fired the first shot on June 25, 1950
takes on a much reduced air of significance. As it is, the north Korean version
of events is that their invasion was provoked by two days of bombardment by
the South Koreans, on the 23rd and 24th, followed by a surprise south Korean
attack across the border on the 25th against the western town of Haeju and
other places. Announcement of the Southern attack was broadcast over the
North's radio later in the morning of the 25th.
Contrary to general belief at the time, no United Nations group--neither the UN
Military Observer Group in the field nor the UN Commission on Korea in
Seoul--witnessed, or claimed to have witnessed, the outbreak of hostilities.
The
Observer Group's field trip along the Parallel ended on June 23. Its statements
about what took place afterward are either speculation or based on information
received form the South Korean government or the US military.
Moreover, early in the morning of the 26th, the South Korean office of Public
Information announced that Southern forces had indeed captured the North
Korean town of Haeju. The announcement stated that the attack had occurred
that same morning, but an American military status report as of nightfall on
the 25th notes that all Southern territory west of the Imjin River had been lost
to a depth of at least three miles inside the border except in the area of the
Haeju "counter attack."
In either case, such a military victory on the part of the Southern forces is
extremely difficult to reconcile with the official Western account, maintained
to this day, that has the North Korean army sweeping south in a devastating
surprise attack, taking control of everything that lay before it, and forcing
South Korean troops to evacuate further south.
South Korea is capable of defending itself, and even if it had difficulty doing
so,
U.S. naval and air power would be available almost immediately to support
South Korean forces. U.S. forces in Korea, seen by the North as a very
dangerous threat, actually have stimulated it to develop nuclear weapons
rather than discourage it. The best option is to withdraw U.S. military forces
from
South Korea.
We would gain by withdrawing U.S. troops by offering something the North
Koreans really want. Establishing diplomatic and economic ties with North
Korea would also encourage a reduction in hostility.
With twice the population, twelve times the economic strength, modern
technology, and a well-equipped military, South Korea will be able to handle
any military challenge posed by North Korea. We may not like North Korea's
government (although U.S. props up dozens around the World without any
qualms) but despite the demonic images conjured up in Washington, the
country poses no threat to the U.S. Our disputes will be resolved faster with
negotiation than with saber rattling. The U.S. government does not condone
some actions of the Chinese communist government next door to North Korea
either but that has not stopped us from working out a way to replace tired,
wasteful, and unnecessary confrontation with mutual beneficial cooperation.