"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:e3e65ef858c201f90ba3b0b9a1c10f2a@news.meganetnews.com...

About to hit the big time as a net kook, Kavik Kang wrote:

Whoooooooooo Hoooooooo!!!!!

I count 27 lunacy filled posts from Kooky Kang to this NG so far
today. Can you say meltdown?

Obviously that was because I wen't three days without posting, so it had
built up. There was no "meltdown", just responses to posts.

Um, I have made no claims. I have merely stated that evidence for

the existence of the Great Wall meets my long-standing
requirements for evidence that I have been demanding of UFO
believers here for years. HTH.

No, you have claimed the wall exists many times, and the 'standards' you are
referring too are a only about a week old. We all saw you write them then.
But then, kooks do that kind of thing.

Because there is no point. I don't give a damn if retards like you
want to deny the existence of the Great Wall.

I do not deny the existance of the great wall.

Further denial noted.

Further intentional misunderstanding noted.

I am a serious researcher

Huh? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Amd an every bit as serious about finding evidence for the great wall as you
are about finding evidence for UFOs.

Kang, I've seen something of your posting history. You are a
shit-stupid, credulous, true-believing, saucer head and utter kook
of the first magnitude. You are most assuredly *not* any sort of
serious researcher. Anyway, thanks for my evening laugh, kook.

You must have been looking at someone elses. Why don't you paste some
examples? You can't, because this is just you being kooky and making things
up.

I'm really going to enjoy casting my vote for you as KOTM. Will
you still be trying to deny your kook status even when you have a
well deserved Usenet Kook of the Month Award sitting on your
mantelpiece?

I doubt that I will be nominated. Based on our threads, however, you may be.