The up and coming net kook known as Kavik Kang wrote:

"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:e3e65ef858c201f90ba3b0b9a1c10f2a@news.meganetnews.com...

About to hit the big time as a net kook, Kavik Kang wrote:

Whoooooooooo Hoooooooo!!!!!

I count 27 lunacy filled posts from Kooky Kang to this NG so far
today. Can you say meltdown?

Obviously that was because I wen't three days without posting, so it had
built up.

Translation: Your OCD forced you to flood the NGs with idiocy. This lame excuse of course does not help explain away the loony content of all those posts.

There was no "meltdown",  just responses to posts.

Lame denial noted. I've gone away for more than two weeks at a time and not made more than a couple of posts on returning, no matter what got posted in my absence. Face it, you are obsessed.

Um, I have made no claims. I have merely stated that evidence for

the existence of the Great Wall meets my long-standing
requirements for evidence that I have been demanding of UFO
believers here for years. HTH.

No, you have claimed the wall exists many times,

I claimed that it exists by my standards. HTH, kook.

and the 'standards' you are
referring too are a only about a week old. We all saw you write them then.

Simply repeating the same amazingly lame lie over and over won't make it true.

But then, kooks do that kind of thing.

Yes, many of you kooks seem to be working from Joseph Goebbels' manual.

Because there is no point. I don't give a damn if retards like you
want to deny the existence of the Great Wall.

I do not deny the existance of the great wall.

Further denial noted.

Further intentional misunderstanding noted.

Further attempts to blur the issue noted.

I am a serious researcher

Huh? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Amd an every bit as serious about finding evidence for the great wall as you
are about finding evidence for UFOs.

But I'm not looking for evidence of UFOs, so how serious can you be? I already know UFOs exist. What I am looking for is evidence that the UFOs are the sorts of things the saucer heads claim they are. Too bad no such evidence exists.

Kang, I've seen something of your posting history. You are a
shit-stupid, credulous, true-believing, saucer head and utter kook
of the first magnitude. You are most assuredly *not* any sort of
serious researcher. Anyway, thanks for my evening laugh, kook.

You must have been looking at someone elses.

Nope. You even admitted it was yours in another thread.

Why don't you paste some
examples?

Already been done in another thread.

You can't, because this is just you being kooky and making things
up.

Denial ain't a river in Egypt, you know. Don't you think that trying to hide the fact that you are a saucer head is rather hypocritical? Or have you come to the realization that to be taken seriously you must deny being a saucer head? Too bad your kookery still shows through in all your posts even when you aren't posting on UFOism, thus denying you the credibility you so desperately crave.

I'm really going to enjoy casting my vote for you as KOTM. Will
you still be trying to deny your kook status even when you have a
well deserved Usenet Kook of the Month Award sitting on your
mantelpiece?

I doubt that I will be nominated.

Not only have you already been nominated, but the nomination has been enthusiastically seconded. We are now only awaiting the FNVW's word on the issue and your inclusion on the ballot. HTH.

Based on our threads, however, you may be.

Delusion noted.

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://mdavis19.tripod.com
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)