| Subject: Re: Attn: Patrick//Another debunking Bentwater myth exposed!! |
| From: David Patrick |
| Date: 29/07/2003, 19:31 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:29:41 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In article <obo7gvgkcnncshur2ncemoe95h0479l8pl@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...
On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 06:57:15 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
In summary, this is an amusing story, but inconsistent with the
data, and unsupported by any documentation or witness testimony.
Actually, I completely agree with Pope on this one. The claim that
that the guy hoaxed the whole thing is clearly rubbish.
Funny, you and the rest of your debunker cult always
seem to be an expert on "rubbish!"
So, you don't think the hoax story is rubbish then, like me and Nick
Pope do? You believe it really was a hoax?
Patty, for somebody who "claims" to have
studied the Bentwater case, your knowledge
about it seems to be absolutely ZERO!!
Whatever happened at Rendlesham it was clearly not a hoax. The claim
by this guy is clearly rubbish. If you think it isn't rubbish then
explain your reasoning.
Please tell your Cult of Useful Idiots®
to vacate these groups, your services are
no longer needed. And in fact they never were.
Okay, then. Flaffer, I have to inform you to vacate these groups as
your services are no longer needed and in fact never were.
Happy now?
David Patrick