Michael Davis wrote:

 > and that "massive" only refers to weight. . .

Well...Yeah. Pardon me for using the English language correctly.

So I suppose calling you a *massive* idiot, can never be intentionally interpreted by you as
incorrect usage?

So, k0ok...

Still claiming that non-beaconed objects/craft/missles/etc... in US airspace giving huge
doppler returns are ignored by NORAD?

Still claiming that those spy sats can't give realtime data to the *owners* of the sat?

Still ignoring the cars frozen in frame on roads and highways in commercial sat images, and
claiming that the military doesn't have something better at their fingertips?

Still claiming that realtime data from various RADAR and other ranging systems can't be linked
to a spy sat network to create a more advanced surveillance system?

--
Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?