Forwarded with Compliments of Free Voice of America (FVOA): Accurate
News and Interesting Commentary for Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning
to Breathe Free. NOTE: The tremendous importance of this piece
below is that it was written by a former Continental Airlines
captain, Ralph Omholt; after reading it, I expect you'll agree that
anyone still clinging to the nostalgic notion that a commercial
jetliner struck the Pentagon on 9-11 must also still believe in the
Tooth Fairy; there is evidently a minor inaccuracy in it, though:
Flight 77 did have children aboard. -- kl, pp
Crime & Corruption
Title: 9-11; What DIDN'T Happen
Published: Jul 27, 2003 Author: Skydrifter Post Date: 2003-07-27
15:05:44 by SKYDRIFTER 264 Comments
9-11 - What DIDN'T Happen [Copy this to a text file for later
reference]
Given all the "mysteries" surrounding 9-11, it is necessary to refer
to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's philosophy:
"When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains - however
improbable - must be the truth."
Start with certain basics at the Pentagon and Flight 77 - no tail,
no wings, and no damage consistent with such a "crash." Even the
Pentagon lawn was undamaged. Seismic monitors don't reveal anything
suggesting such an impact.
Imagine a trans-continental flight with no children, hardly any
passengers and no cargo. The flight arrived in the D.C. area
unexpectedly, yet there is no record - or even 'tales' - of ATC
directing aircraft away from the "rogue aircraft," no ATC warnings,
no calls from ATC attempting to establish contact - on any frequency.
There were no TCAS alarms with aircraft in a busy terminal area,
scattering for clear airspace; with secondary TCAS alarms from the
chaos. Certainly, the fighter non-intercept issue is a story, by
itself - obscured in the cloud of "national security."
To the world of the legitimately curious, one's attention should
first go to the photo on the cover of "The Big Lie" - Thierry
Meyssan. (The contents of that book is a MUST for any serious
American.) There should be no doubt that it's a legitimate photo.
It shows, among other things, a lull in the Pentagon fire, just
after the initial fiery explosion, illustrated in the Pentagon
security video. Among other things, one notices the fire equipment
and ambulances standing by - as though waiting for something to
happen.
How long had they been there? What was going on, that they should
wait? What was known?
As one views that particular image, there is no doubt that a plane
did not hit the Pentagon. The light-poles in the path of the alleged
42-degree path are still standing. There is no hole big enough to
swallow a 757. There is no damage from the supposed wings. The
occasion of the construction at that site is far too "convenient"
to be any form of "coincidence." Later pictures of the light-poles
show them adjacent to their mountings - not propelled forward by
the velocity of a jet. Their mounting plates are not damaged from
the mounting bolts being "pulled through" from an impact. The poles
don't show any predominant "strike" damage.
No pilot will claim to be able to hit such a spot as the Pentagon
base - under any conditions - in a 757 doing 300 knots. As to the
clearly amateur Arab pilots: IMPOSSIBLE!
In that same photograph, there is another fire going behind one of
the most inner rings of the Pentagon. But, the fire is the wrong
location for the alleged 42-degree strike. The predominant smoke
color in the photo is clearly not that of jet fuel. That will be
true in all the photographs of the Pentagon strike - and flight 93,
in Pennsylvania, as well. So, what did happen - to any reasonable
probability of fact? The answer is quite ugly - to those who believe
- or want to believe - in the current American leadership.
Most likely, it was a missile - captured by the Pentagon security
video camera - hit the Pentagon, at approximately a 90-degree angle.
What type of missile & warhead are uncertain. It was most likely
fired from a truck in the vicinity of the trees, directly away from
the strike point. Its obvious size says that it was not a 757. The
imagery is of such quality, that any serious claims of optical
aberrations are out of the question. A 757? IMPOSSIBLE!
Let us pause. Beyond the imagery, why would any rational person
believe it could be a missile? - Because Donald Rumsfeld let it
slip out during an interview; catching himself in one of his famous
Freudian slips. Remember his Freudian view of draftees?
Return to the security camera images. The security imagery shows a
forward-traveling blast, which appears to be gaseous, more than
conventionally explosive. The color of the flame is inconsistent
with burning jet fuel - compare the images of the WTC.
As you view the Thierry Meyssan picture cited above, it clearly did
little more than scorch the Pentagon wall. The blast might have
come from the missile; possibly from something on the order of a
propane tank on the ground. The damage to the Pentagon is clearly
slight, relative to the magnitude of the fiery blast. The vast
majority of the windows in the path of the blast are not broken.
The explosion must have been very brief. In any event, it was clearly
NOT 10,000 gallons of jet fuel, burning out of control. Again, no
supporting seismic data.
Later an incredibly hot fire-ball is seen in many photographs.
Possibly a gas main; perhaps a propane tank - it was not jet fuel
burning. The flame color and propagation is wrong & the tattle-tale
column of black smoke is missing.
The Pentagon security camera video images show a blast occurring
in front of the wall - most likely a missile "proximity fuse."
That blast imagery sets the stage for another conclusion. If that
had been a B-757, the "pristine skin," photographed on the Pentagon
lawn, would have been destroyed, as it comes from the front end of
a 757.
Yet that "pristine skin" shows a shearing force in its damage, not
compression or burn damage - of any type. IMPOSSIBLE!
In the various photograph collections of 9-11, many pictures display
the white office walls to the left of the collapsed section. The
walls are free of the smoke damage, soot & heat of the "intense"
fire that supposedly took place within the building. The furniture
is in good condition - in its original place. The floor-line is
sawed off - inconsistent with a concrete "pour" (no 'common' supports
for a "pour" design). The media would have the public buy into
thousands of degrees melted the steel supports & collapsed the
section. Heat rises, especially "thousands of degrees." But, the
upper offices are nearly untouched by any damage, whatsoever.
IMPOSSIBLE!
The collections of the Pentagon photos also show something else -
the "collapsed" floors, from the intense heat that "melted the
aircraft"
are obviously missing in the outer ring. The aircraft parts in the
photographs are fully exposed, not buried under rubble. The parts
are too few; clearly "salted," in the parlance of miners. The site
was clearly staged. The photos within the building, displaying the
salted aircraft parts, all too clearly show the missing debris of
"collapsed" floors. The "thousands of degrees" would not be limited
to a single ring-section. The "fuel" would not lag the projection
of the "parts."
Those images pose another mystery. In later photos, the third floor
offices to the left of the impact, behind the heliport control cab,
are in full blaze. Imagine the adjacent exposed offices safe from
fire, yet offices far down the hall & insulated from the roof by
the fourth floor are in full blaze. Something is very seriously
wrong, just in that imagery.
Beyond the Pentagon "hit," there's the curious business behind
flight 93, in Pennsylvania - supposedly. A second crash site with
no tail, no wings, minimum "parts" and a missing column of burning
jet fuel. A second trans-continental flight with no children, hardly
any passengers and no cargo. Far too much for "coincidence; IMPOSSIBLE!
The associated flight 93 photographs show a partially burned tree
line, inconsistent with approximately 10,000 gallons of jet fuel.
The burn pattern is wrong; it's symmetrical, not elongated. Again,
the "smoke" photograph of the "crash" is that of ordnance, not jet
fuel.
Clearly, the blast comes from the ground, the "aircraft" was NOT
shot down. Seismic data clearly demonstrates that, as well.
The "distribution" of the few parts and debris are inconsistent.
Some parts were found miles away - in the wrong directions. The
impact site and tree line fire suggest the direction of the alleged
"aircraft" travel; still the distant parts and debris are in the
wrong location - typically too far away, as well. But, clearly an
ordnance explosion would so distribute those parts and debris.
The automatic response to all this goes to the fate of the actual
aircraft & occupants - the real mystery, in all this. Raw guestimation
is the only response available, for the moment. The planes and
occupants are gone; in some fashion. Did the aircraft actually take
off? Who can be certain? If they did, where did they go? What of
the people?
While the "remote control" possibility is viably argued, there is
no known suggestion which allows the aircraft to be taxied among
other aircraft or taken off - particularly at a busy public airport.
Just the required human communication would be on the edge of
impossible.
Once airborne, yes, remote control is possible. To be brief,
reasonable probability is not contained in this scenario.
Clearly in the style of Hollywood, one must speculate that they did
take off. Possibly they flew some portion of their flight. Then at
some point, they turned off their transponders & flew to a closed
Air Force Base, to be hidden in a hangar - probably during the "
land now!" chaos. Afterward - who knows? Are there approximately
110 people with a new identity, face and country of residence? None
of the hijackers' names are on passenger manifests. The aircraft
have probably been disposed of, in some manner. Currently, only
speculation is available.
Return to the phone call of Barbara Olson, wife of the Solicitor
General. A few days after the event, he violates what had to be
"national security" and blabs to CNN that his wife called him collect
on an aircraft cell phone to provide details of the hijacking.
COLLECT?? You need a credit card to use those phones - and she
reversed charges??? Whatever becomes of the associated debate, the
assertion is ludicrous - yet, what did the world read in the news?
Propaganda? PSYOPS? "Perception Control?" Whatever the label; it
worked!
Return to Booker Elementary School. Andrew Card whispers in the ear
of America's President - "America is under Attack." Great PR! What
a fabulous choice of words at a time like that!
Imagine that no further details were provided to the President!
Likewise, there was no demand for details, from him. There was no
reaction from the supposed leader of the free world. Instead, the
"President" sits there listening to a story of a goat! Ten minutes
or thirty minutes, it makes no difference. Either Bush knew in
advance - or he was being herded as a counterfeit President.
Presumably, in that time frame, there could be no known end to the
"attack," by the staff, yet they just let Bush sit there. Eliminating
the impossible, one must conclude that the limits were, in fact,
known. The entire staff couldn't have been so incompetent as to
remain calm, in the face of two terrorist strikes on the World Trade
Center - with no indications that more were not on the way -
somewhere. At least two "alleged" aircraft were still off course &
presumed to be hijacked - yet they let the President just sit there.
Just IMPOSSIBLE!
Certainly the Booker Elementary video will join the "Zapruder Film"
in history.
Bush's later claims as to having witnessed the aircraft strike on
TV don't hold up under elementary scrutiny. His statements (presumed
reasoning) support other evidence of a serious a mental problem.
So, at Booker Elementary, with America under attack, they waited
to take the President to Air Force One; thereafter flying him all
over the country - incommunicado, for all intents & purposes. BUT,
we're told, the hijackers were believed to have the digital codes
for Air Force One, along with the coded identity of Air Force One.
What a frightening state of affairs! Air Force One was a target.
So, in perfect logic, they took the President straight to Air Force
One. No fighters are scrambled to protect the local cities, in the
vicinity of Air Force One. IMPOSSIBLE!
Just imagine the hijackers being so arrogant that they would warn
the White House that they had the codes. Killers don't telegraph
warnings! Imagine the White House being unable to trace the calls.
Imagine the effort it would take to get through to the White House
- for anything. All that on the hijackers' way to paradise! IMPOSSIBLE!
Most importantly, imagine how such a tale would just disappear -
even a bogus claim. No investigations, reprimands or prosecutions
of those in charge of the codes or communication channels. Not even
a statement that the "message" was bogus. IMPOSSIBLE!
AND, what became of those hijackers with the codes? They just
disappeared in the myth of 9-11. Nobody went looking for them. All
those Saudi names & nobody went to Saudi Arabia to track their
"associates." Many of the same names came forward and said, "Hey,
I'm alive; what is this?" No one asked questions or clarified the
issue.
In the damnable lies of history is the "slip" of Tom Kenney, the
infamous FEMA urban Search & Rescue worker. According to his statement
to Dan Rather, the FEMA team arrived the night before 9-11.
Most convenient, if you're planning a "9-11" and want the PR from
it!
Certainly, some debate as to his statement to Dan Rather is available
- until you realize that as a minimum, they would have gone to the
hotel on the night of 9-11. RIGHT! On 9-11, a contracting Search &
Rescue team demonstrated their heroics by going to the hotel.
IMPOSSIBLE!
FEMA clearly inserted the team in anticipation of 9-11.
But, the most damnable piece of history is that of the American
segment of the bin Laden family. In 1999, one of the brothers was
identified by the CIA to Congress as facilitating the finances of
al Qaeda, on Cyprus. In January of 2001, the White House killed an
investigation into the family funding of al Qaeda. In May of 2001,
family members successfully received Swiss citizenship.
Immediately after 9-11, the bin Laden members were assembled - some
by private aircraft - & evacuated - via private aircraft. The FBI
did the "exit interview." The evacuation flight supposedly left