Subject: Re: The Situation in Iraq
From: Sir Arthur
Date: 04/08/2003, 18:25
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct

In article <2vtXa.19483$Id1.1997690@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>, Gordon
Tomlinson says...

BUT THIS STILL SHOW THE BLAME LIES WITH THE MUSLIM FACTION 
WHO ATTACKED ON
9/11 REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU "SPIN" FROM THE TABLOIDS. 

Tabloids, sorry Sludge, you've been outed!!

This was an AMERICAN covert-op, who used
the Saudi's as a cover!!  Nice try though, but again you are wrong!

David Icke�s Research into 9/11!

Icke's research into 9-11 has uncovered some very interesting things: 

o Icke interviewed commercial pilots and found that other than takeoff,
the entire flight is controlled via computer. The computer has various
plot points on it's navigation system, and "tells" the plane "OK, get to
this point" and once its there the computer then directs it to it's next
point, and so on until the program directs the plane to land with pinpoint
precision. Taking the plane off of "auto pilot" is not an easy task, and
when it happens there are a lot of problems that begin to happen. Not
the least of which, a huge control problem. The pilots Icke interviewed
say it would be impossible for someone trained on a Cessna in a flight
school to be able to take over a plane and then fly it so accurately into a
building at 450MPH.

o This familiar shot of Mohammed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari at an
ATM in Maine is also questioned.

The FBI claims that this is Abdulaziz  Alomari with Mohammed Atta

This picture is of the real Abdulaziz Alomari alive and well, a commercial pilot
for Saudi 

Airlines
We all remember the huge press conference where there were 22 large
black and white photos of the hi-jackers and a few other Al-Quaeda
suspects set up on a stage for all the world to see. The truth is that 7 of
the FBI's "hijackers" are alive and well and were nowhere near the WTC
on September 11, 2001. Even still, some of these names remain on the
FBI's hijacker list. Just a coincidence. Nothing to worry about. 

o Icke did some investigating into NORAD's role (or lack of it) on the
morning of 9-11. But first he told us about how NORAD handled the
situation with golfer Payne Stewart's private Lear Jet. The (pre 9-11)
rule is, if an air traffic controller loses contact with any plane, it calls
NORAD. NORAD then dispatches two fighter jets to fly and meet the
plane, and get close enough to it to see what's happening in the cockpit.
NORAD did exactly this October 25, 1999 when Stewart's jet started
acting suspiciously after its takeoff from Florida. Icke states that
NORAD dispatched jets to check out potentially problematic planes
approximately 200 times in 2000. But why were the "hijacked" planes
not responded to in this way? Even if they didn't know about the first
plane until it was too late (though this is highly doubtful since NORAD
claims to have gotten information about the hijackings at 8:38 AM, 10
minutes before the first plane hit the WTC) the next plane didn't hit the
second tower for a full 15 minutes, and the third plane hit the Pentagon
50 minutes after the hijackings were first discovered. Another question
is, why send fighter jets from Massachusetts to investigate a hijacked
plane heading for Washington DC, when Andrews Air Force base is 10
miles away from the Pentagon? And finally the fighter jets were able to
stop a plane, Flight 93, by shooting it out of the sky in Shanksville, PA.
But even that is being covered up with a story about passenger heroics
and patriotism. When Icke called NORAD for information, he was told
that they couldn't (wouldn't) comment because of the "ongoing
investigation." Just a coincidence. Nothing to worry about.

o There's also an interesting connection between the OKC bombing and
the WTC. Both times Controlled Demolition, Inc. was called in to quickly
clean up the area. Something that had investigators at both scenes
extremely frustrated. (It's Icke's belief that Controlled Demolition is a
CIA front). Just a coincidence. Nothing to worry about.