Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS demonstrably wrong!!
Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS demonstrably wrong!!
From: hugh
Date: 05/08/2003, 19:47
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic



Sir Arthur the Great®®® wrote:
In article <3F0A8A8A.E6FE0946@nospam.idiom.com>, John C. Randolph says...


Why don't we start with Artie's pretensions of knighthood?


Why don't "we" start with getting rid of the debunkers,
useful idiots and so-called skeptics.

Because debunkers are funny and you are not!
Ask another stupid question Jerry