On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 05:35:23 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <u423jvk5m0dpan9djqujejgtcesj6cmtr9@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 20:56:10 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

Aliens Are Alien Even to Themselves/Multi-Galactic Battle-Zone!//ETs vs. ETs!!!

An abductee once pointed out that, "There are so many different types of
extraterrestrials, that it is not possible to make statements that are valid for
all of them.  Many types are as alien to each other as they are to us."

An interesting attempt to rationalise all the contradictory UFO and
alien reports.

But, Flaffer, which UFO cases exactly have you personally
investigated?

Patty, I though you were going to leave this newsgroup by today!

No, Flaffer. I actually told you to get your makebelieve general to
lock me up. Every day I and the other sceptics are free to point out
the vast gaping holes in your logic is another day that your threats
are shown to empty.

I'll have to notify the General and tell him you
unilaterally reversed your decision.  Bad choice, Patty!

Go on, then. When exactly are they coming for me? Tomorrow? Next week?
Never?

BTW, your dossier came up and it looks like
you have NEVER posted one constructive 
article about any topic related to the alien presence.

No, Flaffer, that's what we said about you (though we didn't make up
nonsense like going through dossiers). Do you think we don't notice
that all you can do is take our arguments and repeat them back to us
verbatim. Ah well, emulation is the sincerest form of flattery. 

And no, what you're doing is not a parody of us. If it's a parody of
anything it's a parody of those who think UFOs are alien spacecraft,
which is why you're so often labelled a debunker yourself.

So when are you going to start.  There are 35,000 newsgroups
you can disrupt.  (And that goes double for U. Bob,
Wider Anal-sham, The Sludge/Sage, Wilson,  Hughe/Sucke, 
Davis, Lewis, Chump-Pest and Wally Anglesea, )

Look, I want to discuss UFOs. You're the one who refuses to name one
single case you've investigated.

Patty, when you are having your confab with your fellow debunkers,
you better tell them that "we" are on to them and they are being
roundly ignored.  

If we're being totally ignored then how can you explain your hissy fit
of a post?

This is the wrong group to discuss mental illness (U Bob);
anal-sex (Wider-Sham), tabloids (The Sludge/Sage),
potty-mouty language (Chump-Pest), 
clap-trap (Anglesea), NSA spOOks (Borsch/Echelon)
NASA-never a straight answer (O-BORG).

Or 11/9 and Iraq War conspiracy theories (Flaffer)

This IS the proper group to discuss:
animal mutilations, alien abductions,
trace cases, multiple-witness sightings,
crop impressions, back-engineered alien craft,
military documents, Area-51, alien implants,
Bentwaters and other subjects related to
UFOs and the alien presence.

So why won't you then?

Now if you choose to stay
(and we hope you DON'T)
please stick to those topics.

Okay, let's get back on topic. Which UFO case that you personally have
investigated do you want to discuss? (See, I'm letting you pick the
case, you can't say fairer than that, now can you?).


David Patrick