| Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS demonstrably wrong!! |
| From: "Joe Bloue" <joeb@somesillyplace.com> |
| Date: 07/08/2003, 21:58 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic |
"Sir Arthur the Great���" <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:3kxXa.14289$cJ5.1176@www.newsranger.com...
In article <3F0A8A8A.E6FE0946@nospam.idiom.com>, John C. Randolph says...
Why don't we start with Artie's pretensions of knighthood?
Why don't "we" start with getting rid of the debunkers,
useful idiots and so-called skeptics.
-snip-
So just who are these debunkers Sir Arthur?