Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS demonstrably wrong!!
From: "Joe Bloue" <joeb@somesillyplace.com>
Date: 07/08/2003, 23:41
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic

"hugh" <hughe@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:3F32CD64.7010908@frontiernet.net...


Joe Bloue wrote:
"Sir Arthur the Great���" <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:3kxXa.14289$cJ5.1176@www.newsranger.com...

In article <3F0A8A8A.E6FE0946@nospam.idiom.com>, John C. Randolph
says...


Why don't we start with Artie's pretensions of knighthood?

Why don't "we" start with getting rid of the debunkers,
useful idiots and so-called skeptics.


-snip-

So just who are these debunkers Sir Arthur?



Everybody! Where did you come from? :)

Hey!  I'm new here.  Give me some time! ;-)