Subject: Re: Q: How do I become a Usenet UFO Debunker?//Easy-Follow theserules!!A retarded one-toed sloth could do it!!!
From: Robert Wolfe
Date: 07/08/2003, 22:23
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.usenet.kooks

Woooooooooo Hooooooooooo!!!

We have meltdown! Let the froth begin:

Michael Davis wrote:

Notorious net kook and obsessed stalking freak Roberta (mop
jockey) Wolfe wrote:

Woooooooooo Hooooooooooo!!!

We have meltdown! Let the froth begin:

Michael Davis wrote:


Notorious net kook and stalking freak Roberta (mop jockey) Wolfe
wrote:


Michael Davis wrote:



Notorious net kook and stalking freak Roberta "Mop Jockey" Wolfe
wrote:



Can anybody else figure out why I praised Mike on his k0oky kut-and-paste
job?

--- Cue sound of crickets chirping ---

Well gee, I guess nobody can.


Can what?



Here's another question. Can anybody figure out why you post the
kooky bullshit you do?


Can they?



I mean other than the obvious reasons that
you are a kook and a psycho?



Am I?  Is that why you're so afraid of me?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Hey, Roberta, you misspelled "amused by me." HTH.


I guess *you* did too, eh?

http://groups.google.com/groups?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&q=author%3Amdavis19%40ix.netcom.com+%22afraid+of+me%22+OR+%22fears+me%22

"Re: Roberta fears me
Notice how he/she/it refuses to reply to me these days? Whadda coward. If
and
when he/she/it does, it will probably be with a shiny new sock puppet.
...
alt.alien.visitors - Aug 15, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (59
articles)

Re: Roberta still fears me.
Kind of sad and pathetic, isn't he/she? Seems like you are in full
retreat in regards to Robert. How so? I'm just pointing out that ...
alt.alien.visitors - Jun 25, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (4
articles)

Re: More Crop Glyphs Images
... I'll just tell everyone that you are running away from me because you
are
afraid
of me and you can't stand seeing me expose the lies and utter stupidity
in ...
alt.alien.research - Aug 27, 2001 by Michael Davis - View Thread (4
articles)

Re: Q: How do I become a Usenet UFO Debunker?//Easy-Follow ...
... Can they? I mean other than the obvious reasons that you are a kook
and a
psycho?
Am I? Is that why you're so afraid of me?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
...
alt.alien.visitors - Aug 2, 2003 by Michael Davis - View Thread (8
articles)

Re: Muppet Jockey Rides Again!
...
google.com/groups?num=100&hl=en&lr=lang_en%7Clang_de%7Clang_es&ie=ISO-8859-1&newwindow=1&q=author%3Amdavis19%40ix.netcom.com+%22roberta+fears+me%22

Compulsive ...
alt.alien.visitors - Jul 11, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (8
articles)

Roberta is seriously confused was: Mike Davis is a HUGE IDIOT.
... Order Brides http://mdavis180.tripod.comhttp://kook-kult.org Member
#264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I wish Robert M. Wolfe was afraid of me" Club
"Rick ...
alt.alien.research - Jul 5, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (1
article)"




--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://mdavis19.tripod.com
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often
erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)



It?s really not that hard to figure out.  Don?t think too hard...  I know
Mikey won?t.

Michael Davis wrote:




Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote:

A bunch of stale old bullshit that got flushed.

How do you become a debunker? Glad you asked.

First, learn to read, and correctly comprehend what you read.

Next don?t waste your newfound reading skills on garbage like
supermarket tabloids, fringe web sites, or books put out by
pseudo-scientific cranks. Stick to mainstream, credible sources.
If a story is real, it will eventually show up there.

Next, have a rubectomy done. Remove all traces of credulity,
faith, gullibility and true belief from your mind. Remember that
just because a lot of people choose to believe in something
doesn?t necessarily mean that it is true.

Learn the definition of evidence as it is used in science. Forget
about the legal definition of evidence, as it is useless for
finding the truth. Law isn?t about truth. If it were then innocent
men would never go to prison and guilty men would never go free.

Next, learn to be skeptical. News flash: Not everyone is telling
the truth. Learn to be skeptical of claims that sound improbable,
impossible, or just plain wrong, especially when they don?t come
with any supporting evidence (see above).

Learn that the onus of proof is always on the claimant. They have
the total obligation to back up their claims. You are under no
obligation whatsoever to try to disprove their claim or locate any
contradictory evidence. The mere failure of a claimant to back up
his claim with evidence is reason enough to assume the claim may
be incorrect.

Don?t let anyone convince you that your standards are too high or
that they are impossible to meet. You will quickly find that
people making claims based in reality will have no trouble backing
up those claims with evidence. Only people whose claims are based
on nothing more than fantasy, faith, delusion or fraud will have
trouble doing so.

Next, challenge anyone making a claim you find improbable to back
up their claim with evidence.

If they cannot or will not produce the requested evidence, point
out to them that they have failed to make their case, and that you
see no valid reason to believe their claim is true.

If they persist in promoting their unproven claim as if it were
fact, then they are clearly engaged in lying. You may now assume
they are just peddling bunk, and begin using debunking tactics
such as ridicule to expose their lies and falsehoods, and remove
any credibility they may have.

Congratulations, you are now a debunker.

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://mdavis19.tripod.com
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often
erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)


(Why so many question marks k0ok?)

--
Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?





See above how my text-only reader couldn't translate your non-typed
apostrophes?

Translation: Your software is crap


My software is *compliant*.


and you are too stupid to fix


Fix what?  Fix your stupid non-plaintext BS?  I can recall someone here
whining
about base64 posts, and how it was the *poster's* problem... hmmmm...


the problem, so you just whine about it instead.



http://groups.google.com/groups?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&q=author%3Amdavis19%40ix.netcom.com+%22base64%22

"Re: Debunkers flip-flopping and squirming again!
Notorious net kook and transvestite Roberta (mop jockey) Wolfe foamed:
Oh look, it's Roberta's weekly non base64 post. Hey, mop ...
alt.alien.research - Dec 8, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (16
articles)

Re: Hey Mike! Got those Content-Type Blues?
... HTH Can you say lame? Roberta comes up with the lamest excuses I have
ever
heard.
It's clearly his/her kooky base64 shenanigans that is causing the
problem. ...
alt.alien.visitors - Dec 1, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (8
articles)

Re: Does Roberta even understand what a hypocrite s/he is?
... Projection noted. Your reader almost positively decodes base64
internally.
Case in point... this message is encoded base64! Don't believe me? ...
alt.alien.research - Nov 25, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (1
article)

Re: FTL tunneling
John Lewis wrote: That cowardly mop jockey must still be hiding behind
her base64 BS because I can't see the post you are responding to. ...
alt.alien.research - Dec 6, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (9
articles)

Mop Jockey is totally insane Was: Contrails ? Air Planes or UFOs ...
John Lewis wrote: I can't see Roberta's posts in this thread. S/he must
be
cowardly
hiding behind her base64 stupidity again. And I'm not surprised. ...
alt.alien.research - Dec 3, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (1
article)

Re: Carl has gone completely stupid.
... it sure looks like you've been responding to "garbled" messages on
Google.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 HTH.
...
alt.alien.visitors - Dec 1, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (3
articles)

Does Roberta enjoy talking to herself?
I just found something interesting in Google. The archive is full
of base64 posts from Roberta. I didn't see any of those posts ...
alt.alien.visitors - Nov 25, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (8
articles)

Re: Walter Pullen discusses alien hybridization.
... screw 'em... Ah, this is the "logic" behind your posing in base64 and
other antics like embedding binaries and posting in HTML. While ...
alt.alien.research - Dec 23, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (14
articles)

Re: Why Stupidism?
... jockey) Wolfe put his ignorance on public display thusly: Robert
Wolfe
<rob@www.genetics.pitt.edu>
wrote: (some nonsense in html) That's base64 MIME encoding ...
alt.alien.visitors - Nov 14, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (7
articles)

Re: Are drug dealers trying to kill you?
... Wouldn't there have to be a first before there could be a next?
Please,
tell us how
Google's refusal to decode base64 consitutes a meltdown, Kook Kaptain
Karl. ...

alt.alien.visitors - Nov 11, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (11
articles)

Re: AS PREDICTED: Queen Michele Davis won't admit SHE is lying. ...
... Just yew Mikey-wikey! I actually prefer base64, cause I like how
Google
archives
it! Kooky Karl has to jump through hoops to do his archiving... ...
alt.alien.visitors - Aug 21, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (5
articles)

Re: AS PREDICTED: Roberta won't admit he/she is lying. NO, NO, NO ...
... Dream on. I actually prefer base64, cause I like how Google archives
it!
Kooky
Karl has to jump through hoops to do his archiving... I just love it.
Yawn. ...

alt.alien.visitors - Aug 20, 2002 by Michael Davis - View Thread (1
article)"


The question marks didn't show up until *you* started responding


BZZZZT! Wrongo!

Ask anybody else who uses a text based reader.  Seems to me that this is
very
similar to what you claim *your* newsreader did to my posts in the past.
That
base64 "problem" sure didn't rear it's ugly head until your disabled
newsreader
started displaying "garbled gobbledygook" (new technical term for base64
MIME).

Remember when you were replying to my base64 posts showing my quoted text
plain
as day, but claimed simultaneously that they were "unreadable".  K0oky,
k0oky.


to my post. All the apostrophes were in their correct places in my
post.



Sure they were.  I wasn't contending that, was I?  I am contending that
the
fontset used for your "smart quotes" was not the same one your actual
typed
text was in.  It was an extended fontset, etc...  It proves you cut and
pasted
like a k0ok.

http://www.fourmilab.ch/webtools/demoroniser/
[...]
"NAME

demoroniser - correct moronic and gratuitously incompatible HTML
generated by Microsoft applications

SYNOPSIS

demoroniser [ -u ] [ -wcols ] [ infile ] [ outfile ]"
[...]

HTH.  Don't wear it out, now...


I notice that Harlow has the same problem sometimes with his cut and
pastes.
Would it help to point out that in the bulk of your messages the
apostrophes
don't "magically" become question marks, yet somehow this happened with
your
recent k0ok-poast, above?

I like how your comeback was that it was "original"...

Come on now, admit you like all my posts. You certainly read and
obsess over them all, right down to how you think they may have
been created. That's really kooky.



Kooky like your reaction to "sombody else's" base64 post you couldn't
*help* but download and read and whine about for about 2 months
straight.  Agreed?


as if doubted that
anybody else on earth had enough time to waste putting together such a
k0oky
list.
I never claimed it wasn't original.

Well the common usage of the accusation of cutting and pasting on
Usenet is to accuse someone of plagiarizing


Common usage?  If I was accusing you of plagarism, I would have said so,
nutcase.


But I should have
known from
long experience that kooks like you and Garrrrry use the language
in very non-standard ways.



Your intentional "misunderstanding" is the only standard around here.


I claimed you cut it out of
something (browser or Word probably), and pasted it into your response.
That's all.

Well thanks for pointing out something totally irrelevant to
everyone who isn't running the same crap software you are.



Thanks for caring enough to once again reply to li'l ol' me.  Nice to see
I'm still "stalking" you, then.


Back to your meltdown.

*My* meltdown? Projection noted, mop jockey. You don't see me
throwing a fit over such irrelevancies.



Just base64, eh?  ...cause your newsreader can't translate base64, I've
heard.


Later, frootcake. I'm off to AUK vote for your new hero Kang as KOTM.



Sounds important... Don't let anyone get in your way as you run away,
rubbaneck.

Wow, whadda meltdown.

I see you ended your little rant on a fantasy note, just as you
began it. Nobody runs from pathetic, powerless, whiny, willfully
stupid, little, girlie "men" kooks like you. People may leave in
disgust or out of pity, but nobody runs from the likes of you.


The point that I was trying to make was that it's k0oky to claim people are "afraid" to respond to your usenet poast, fuckwad.

The outside reader sees you playing both sides of the imaginary fence you've built, once again.  Congratulations, k0ok.


As for the incoherent ravings in your meltdown, well as usual, you
are full of shit. Face it, *you* are the only person whining about
my post. Nobody else seems to have a problem. Unlike with your
past episodes of deliberate post-munging  which were
incomprehensible to many and rejected by Google (which was no
doubt your real goal).


So if they were "rejected by Google" then how do you explain this, you waste of neurons?

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&frame=right&th=acef30456b3f9505&seekm=3DD42EA7.8010006%40ix.netcom.com#link1

...and better yet...

Explain how you are seen replying to one of those "incomprehensible" messages?  I thought your news provider dropped them, or your newsreader can't
decode base64 MIME, or you just don't like me and like to bitch about anything I do different, including my mockery of your stupid behavior, which is
it, now?

Maybe someday you'll actually realize why I posted in base64 and maybe also what you proved about your k0oky ass with your responding.



Too bad your butt buddy Garrrry<SMEK!>

Too bad you can't last more than 2 seconds without brining him into every conversation you have, k0ok.  What Garry thinks or does is soooo relevant to
*your* lying, stupid, incompetent, ranting, raving, lunatic, k0oky BS, that we're talking about right now.

Send him an email if you miss him so much, dipshit.

--
The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
http://mdavis19.tripod.com
http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club

"There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often
erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)

Wow, whadda meltdown.

I see you ended your little rant on a fantasy note, just as you
began it.

(No doubt "Scissor Man" will come snipping, snipping, snipping...  Too many examples of Mikey's hypocritical stupidity above!  That's if he's not "too
scared" to respond.)

--
Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?