On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 01:24:39 GMT, Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A! <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <3F36DBA7.9060805@frontiernet.net>, hugh says...

Sir Arthur CBE Wholeflaffers ASA wrote:


Gee Artie
We all knew you would post something like this..

Who do you mean by "we", Kimosabee.
By we do you mean other useful idiots
like U Bob and Sludge/Sage, do you
mean low-level spOOks like O-BORG and
Borsch, do you mean the Anal-Butt connection
like Wider-Sham and Hughe/Sucke, or
do you mean those seeking the truth
like myself and a scant few others?

Post something original and on-topic and then you won't be met with
universal scorn.

Name one case you personally have investigated? If you're such a great
researcher why can't you even manage that?

Yes, I ONLY post when I can verify that
my posts are 100% accurate.

You tend to steal the iraq/11-9 stories from reliable sources most of
the time. That appears to be the only verification you do. It's a pity
you never verify that your posts are off-topic or not.

Now please leave and take the rest of your
stupid Cult with you.

Impotent footstamping never worked before, why do you think it will
work now? Why not try stopping evading and answer the question?

But you won't of course, if you respond at all it will be with more
cut-n-paste (probably willfully off-topic) and/or insults. You simply
don't have aything else to offer.


David Patrick