On 10 Aug 2003 16:22:15 -0700, rwalker@nycc.edu (Robert A. Walker)
wrote:

edconrad@shenhgts.net (Ed Conrad) wrote in message news:<3f364af8.177715832@news.shenhgts.net>...

<
<
edconrad@shenhgts.net (Ed Conrad) wrote in message
news:<3f34f22c.89434949@news.shenhgts.net>...
<
snip paranoid rambling.
<

=============================================

snip

As for your osteons, are you aware that petrification process
displaces osteons and leaves only the Haversian canals?

Are you aware that you're wrong? --

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone7.jpeg

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone2.jpeg

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone4.jpeg

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone5.jpeg

And are YOU aware, Dr. Walker, that these photos appeared on the very
same web page by Andrew Macrae in which he fraudulently posted
microscopic photos of the cell structure of a rock, trying to con
people into thinking it was the cell structure of EC96-001, the
specimen that bone expert identified as a portion of a petrified
tibia.

Fossil dinosaur bone.  Note the well-marked, distinctive haversian
systems.  Without those, what you have a is a porous rock. Which is
what you have, along with your vaguely gourd-shaped "fossilized gall
bladder", your mishapen lump of stone you call a lung, and a supposed
"cranium" that would have come, if it were a human cranium, from
someone who must have stood 10 feet tall.  No doubt proof that "there
were giants in the earth" in those days.

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?