edconrad@shenhgts.net (Ed Conrad) wrote in message news:<3f36f34b.220811497@news.shenhgts.net>...

On 10 Aug 2003 16:22:15 -0700, rwalker@nycc.edu (Robert A. Walker)
wrote:

edconrad@shenhgts.net (Ed Conrad) wrote in message news:<3f364af8.177715832@news.shenhgts.net>...

<
<
edconrad@shenhgts.net (Ed Conrad) wrote in message
news:<3f34f22c.89434949@news.shenhgts.net>...
<
snip paranoid rambling.
<

=============================================

 snip

As for your osteons, are you aware that petrification process
displaces osteons and leaves only the Haversian canals?

Are you aware that you're wrong? --

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone7.jpeg

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone2.jpeg

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone4.jpeg

http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/dino_bone5.jpeg

And are YOU aware, Dr. Walker, that these photos appeared on the very
same web page by Andrew Macrae in which he fraudulently posted
microscopic photos of the cell structure of a rock, trying to con
people into thinking it was the cell structure of EC96-001, the
specimen that bone expert identified as a portion of a petrified
tibia.

When did you stop beating your wife, Ed?

It's pretty close to the same kind of question. 

The fact is, Ed, that there was no fraud on the part of Andrew or
anyone else other than you.  As accounts have shown, you make NONE of
these kinds of accusations until well after the fact; and the fact is
that you DO make them up - you LIE about them, Ed.  They are complete
fabrications.

Now, if that isn't the case, then take my challenge.  Let's put you on
a polygraph.  Then let's take EC96-001 and subject it to testing right
in front of you AND VIDEO TAPE IT for posterity, after which you will
certify that the testing was done in an honest and forthright manner.

I offered to pay half the costs for all of this and your air fare and
your lodging.  I offered to pay the full costs for the polygraph, Ed.

Is there a problem? 

< snip >