Reply to article by: nyceddie@webtv.net (E. L.)
Date written: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:48:14 -0400 (EDT)
MsgID:<16397-3F3E988E-100@storefull-2377.public.lawson.webtv.net>

The "U" in UFO still just stands for "Unidentified."

So what?

So don't try to identify it as ETs vehicle.

We're still dealing with unknown (not always aerial) anomalous
objects. So, instead of sounding stupid, which you are so good at, just
come up with appropriate initials, such as the following which have been
suggested since the '60s: U(nidentified) A(nomalous) O(bjects), for an
old example.

Just because it is unidentified does not mean it is anomalous. To be considered
an anamoly it would have to be *identified* as such.

The so-called "rods" are merely video artifacts caused by bugs.

You couldn't sound or be any more stupid/ignorant than you are with this
claim.

Why can't you refute his claim?

The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page      :           http://members.cox.net/the.sage

A mind is a terrible thing to waste...especially on creationists.
Just say no to organized superstitions, blind faith beliefs, and
ancient books with inaccurate science, blatant contradictions,
and false prophecies
=============================================================