The UFO Challenge By Stanton Friedman

As a nuclear physicist who has had a serious interest in flying saucers since
1958, I have reached four major conclusions:

The evidence is overwhelming that Planet Earth is being visited by
intelligently controlled extraterrestrial spacecraft. In other words, SOME UFOs
are alien spacecraft. Most are not.

The subject of flying saucers represents a kind of Cosmic Watergate, meaning
that some few people in major governments have known since July, 1947, when two
crashed saucers and several alien bodies were recovered in New Mexico, that
indeed SOME UFOs are ET. As noted in 1950, it's the most classified U.S. topic.

None of the arguments made against conclusions One and Two by a small group of
debunkers such as Carl Sagan, my University of Chicago classmate for three
years, can stand up to careful scrutiny.

The Flying Saucer story is the biggest story of the millennium: visits to
Planet Earth by aliens and the U.S. government's cover-up of the best data (the
bodies and wreckage) for over fifty years.

Since 1967 I have lectured on the subject "Flying Saucers ARE Real" at more
than 600 colleges and over 100 professional groups in all fifty US states, nine
Canadian Provinces, twelve cities in England and nine in other countries, with
only eleven hecklers. I have also appeared on hundreds of radio and TV shows.
Overall, I have probably answered about 35,000 questions about UFOs and
secrecy.

It's clear that over 97% of the people have NOT read any of the five major
scientific studies I discuss, and are unaware of the mountains of evidence that
support my conclusions. They are also unaware of the scientific data, as
opposed to tabloid nonsense. However, it is also clear from the Opinion Polls
and from my own experience that indeed most people accept the notion that SOME
UFOs are alien spacecraft. The greater the education, the MORE likely an
individual is to accept this proposition. In an October 25, 1995, Oxford
University Debate on the resolution "Planet Earth is being visited by
intelligent extraterrestrial life", the affirmative side, of which I was a
part, garnered 60% of Debate Union Member votes on the question. Ninety-two
percent of 100,000 people calling during a TV Debate in London on June 27,1997,
said Earth has been visited by aliens!

The problem is NOT that there is not enough evidence to justify my conclusions;
but that most people, especially the noisy negativists, are unaware of the
real, non-tabloid evidence.

Debunkers seem to employ four major rules:

What the public doesn't know, we certainly won't tell them. The largest
official USAF UFO study isn't even mentioned in twelve anti-UFO books, though
every one of those books' authors was aware of it.

Don't bother me with the facts, my mind is made up.

If one can't attack the data, attack the people. It is easier.

Do one's research by proclamation rather than investigation. It is much easier,
and nobody will know the difference anyway.

Many major media people will concede that if indeed aliens are visiting earth,
that would be a major story. But because they take great pride in their
KNOWLEDGE of major stories, if this were happening they would know about it.
But they don't. Therefore, anybody who says visits are real must be a crackpot.

I have noted four major reasons why the big names in science and journalism
haven't jumped on the pro-UFO bandwagon:

Ignorance of the data. Scratch a debunker and one usually finds somebody who is
putting down what he is not up on.

Fear of ridicule in sponsoring a thesis (only about ten have been submitted
relating to UFOs) if a professor, or sponsoring a detailed reportorial
investigation if an editor. I check all my audiences and find that, while in
agreement with polls, 10% have had a sighting but only 5-10% of these witnesses
have been willing to report what they saw. Biggest reason? Fear of ridicule.

Ego. If aliens were visiting Earth, they would call a press conference or ask
to talk to the National Academy of Sciences. They haven't, so aliens must not
be visiting. Flying saucers finish the job Copernicus started in taking man out
of the middle of the universe. Priests fought Copernicus's ideas. Today guys in
lab coats, rather than priestly robes, fight alien visitations.

Failure to use our knowledge of technology to understand UFO behavior. They say
"It is impossible," rather than "I don't know how." Despite the absurd claims
of certain ancient academics and fossilized physicists, it is clear on the
basis of solid engineering studies that trips to nearby stars are feasible with
round trip times shorter than the average person's lifetime -- using, for
example, staged fission and fusion propulsion systems. I have worked on both.
It's clear that technological progress comes from doing things differently in
an unpredictable way. The history of science is littered with challenges,
leveled by people who know nothing about the job at hand, against traditionally
"impossible" claims.

The cult of S.E.T.I. (Silly Effort To Investigate) with its crazy notions that
nobody would travel -- but that aliens, stuck at the level of radio, are trying
to attract our attention -- mocks the notion of flying saucers, not by dealing
with the evidence, but by proclamations about the ABSENCE of evidence. This
ignores science.

I prove at every lecture that the NSA and CIA are withholding UFO data. Having
worked under security for fourteen years, visited seventeen document archives,
and having become aware of the huge black budgets of the NSA, NRO, CIA, DIA,
etc., I know how easy it is to keep secrets. My nineteen years of study about
crashed saucers, and thirteen years on the Majestic-12 documents have convinced
me these are real. The challenge for us all, as we enter the new millennium, is
to recognize that while our future is in space, we are not alone. I truly hope
we qualify for admission to the Cosmic Kindergarten.

Stanton Friedman



If you haven't gotten the idea that this world is run by a criminal 
elite lacking the slightest concern for the welfare of mankind, then you haven't
been paying attention. 
--Jim Keith