edconradx@aol.com wrote in message news:<a6d21557.0308170637.6ee40d@posting.google.com>...

<
<
<
<
What the hell are YOU doing here?
<
You're NOT a newspaper editor!
<
You have a lot of Goddamn nerve.

< snip > 

We've done this one, Ed, pretty recently.  I just wanted to note again
that you are so pathetic that you probably sat at your computer day
and night waiting for talk.origins to return.  It's actually an
amusing image.

But tell me, Ted, in his note to you about "mammalian bone" being part
of an "unbeatable combination," why do you suppose Krogman put
"mammalian" in quotes?

Why can we never see that comment in the context of the entire note?

In fact, why is it that ALL of your comments from Krogman are so
carefully posed?

Krogman thought you were "something of a lunatic," Ed.  Could it be
that you know this all along and this is your way of getting back at
him - to smear him?