Subject: Re: [southnews] Iraqis: 'The Americans are to blame'
From: Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A.
Date: 24/08/2003, 02:25
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct

In article <bi9439$26di$1@pencil.math.missouri.edu>, Dave Muller says...

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/7gSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 If a random sample of people in Baghdad is anything to go by, Iraqis 
have a pretty good idea who blew up the United Nations headquarters 
here. It was the Americans.

Who else, they ask, wanted the UN out of the country?

'The Americans are to blame'

Patrick Graham 	
National Post (Canada)

Saturday, August 23, 2003

BAGHDAD - If a random sample of people in Baghdad is anything to go by, 
Iraqis have a pretty good idea who blew up the United Nations 
headquarters here. It was the Americans.

Who else, they ask, wanted the UN out of the country?

Whatever group, in fact, carried out that strange and confusing attack, 
the theories circulating here tell you a lot about how suspicious Iraqis 
are of the Americans.

"Seventy per cent of the people I know blame the Americans," says Rafed 
as we sit in his upper middle-class home in a wealthy Baghdad 
neighbourhood. "Whenever something big happens, even Sept. 11, we always 
blame the U.S. because only they can do something that is difficult."

This faith in American know-how may be one reason Iraqis are so 
perplexed the reconstruction program is moving so slowly. It is not just 
the bombing the Americans are blamed for, it's pretty much every thing 
else that has gone wrong in a country where people feel life is getting 
progressively worse.

The gulf between the way the United States, and even the UN, perceive 
themselves and their image here seems almost unbridgeable.

Local businessmen who supported the invasion complain about the 
privatization process and the foreign carpetbaggers arriving to vacuum 
up the country's patrimony. Everybody else complains about the lack of 
security, the lack of power and the brutality and arrogance of American 
soldiers.

These are not minor worries in a country where temperatures can reach 
50C. Sleeping without a fan or air conditioner feels like lying in warm 
vaseline. If 10,000 people died during the recent heat wave in France, 
where temperatures were 10 to 15 degrees cooler, imagine how many might 
have died here where mothers are forced to wrap their children in wet 
towels to keep them from overheating.

Lawlessness is another common complaint. A few days ago, a driver 
working for foreign journalists was car-jacked by men armed with guns 
and a pistol. When he pulled over, grabbed the keys and ran, they shot 
at him. The aged pickup he was driving was worth no more than a few 
hundred dollars, if that.

The greatest threat to foreigners in Baghdad may be terrorism, but 
Iraqis are much more likely to be shot in such mundane hold-ups or 
caught in the cross-fire of a U.S. military action. As Iraqi goodwill 
evaporates, the likelihood of their helping the resistance, foreign or 
local, grows dramatically.

The overall situation is opaque and the the UN bombing has not made it 
any easier to figure out. No one is really sure who organized the 
attack. The al-Qaeda connection may sound plausible in Washington, but 
there has been little actual proof of its involvement, which leaves 
people here speculating.

"It was probably the Iranians," a former general in the Iraqi army told 
us earlier in the week. "They are like eels -- always trying to muddy 
the water. And car bombs are their style. They blew up our embassy in 
Beirut in 1981 and our Ministry of Planning in the 1980s with the exact 
same method. What is the benefit for al-Qaeda if they do this? Why have 
they not attacked the UN in Africa or Afghanistan?"

The general, who did not want his name published because he is trying to 
work with the Americans, thought that no matter who carried out the 
operation, the Americans still bore a great deal of responsibility.

"The Americans are to blame because they failed to secure the army bases 
and ammunition dumps after they invaded," he said. "There is still a 
working anti-aircraft gun behind my house. They stood by and watched the 
looters take everything from the government ministries, including the 
army bases.

"After the war in 1991, 15 of the country's governorates were as chaotic 
as the country was after this last war and we lost a lot of weapons. We 
offered large rewards for weapons and retrieved probably three-quarters 
of them. Everybody in the country was looking for weapons to sell us. We 
were even able to get some American weapons that they had left behind, 
including some new rocket launchers. But the U.S. army waited too long 
and offered too little money. Some of us went and told them that these 
armaments would be used against them but they ignored us. Even the 
helicopters and airplanes were broken up and the parts were smuggled to 
Iran."

The general said he knew of several places where a well-connected person 
could buy the kind of munitions used in the attack, in addition to 
mortars or grenades.

"They will sell it to anybody who pays and won't turn them in to the 
Americans," he said.

Although there have been claims the truck that carried the munitions 
came from Syria, it was a Russian-made Kamas flat-bed model commonly 
used by the Iraqi army, which shipped them in for civilian purposes and 
then painted them green.

The reaction of Iraqis to the bombing is complex and not easily 
understood by outsiders. A surprising number are simultaneously 
sympathetic to the UN workers and impressed by the attack.

When the bomb went off, we were seated in the waiting room of a police 
station in the so-called Sunni triangle, the region where anger at the 
Americans is most apparent. The reaction to the bombing was upbeat, like 
the home team scoring a goal at the local soccer stadium.

But it is not just the Sunni areas that make few distinctions between 
between foreigners, such as UN workers, and the occupying U.S. forces.

"I was in the area around Hilla with a group of Shia religious leaders 
when the Red Cross vehicle was attacked," said Michael Birmingham, a 
human rights activist living in Iraq. "And they clearly did not make any 
distinction between westerners. The combination of Iraqi government 
paranoia and the policies of isolating Iraq has effectively made many 
here unable to differentiate westerners."

Mr. Birmingham, who came to Iraq as a volunteer for the UN Development 
Program last fall, said that in the minds of many Iraqis, the UN is 
associated with 12 years of sanctions that caused more suffering than 
the war itself.

Mr. Birmingham, who was inside the UN building when the blast took 
place, believes it had too much U.S. presence rather than too little, 
making it an attractive target.

"We had been saying for weeks that the UN could be a target," he said. 
"UN workers had been complaining about the presence of the soldiers."

Mr. Birmingham managed to escape from the battered building, but once 
outside he saw a badly wounded man he recognized from UNICEF, Canadian 
Christopher Klein-Beekman, who later died of his injuries. Mr. 
Birmingham stayed with Mr. Klein-Beekman, trying to keep his airway open 
until two men took over and they rode together in an ambulance to the 
hospital.

"What is heartbreakingly sad about the attack is that the people who 
were breaking down barriers between the West and Iraqi society were 
killed -- like Chris. He was a knowledgeable, concerned and passionate 
spokesman for the Iraqi people."

The archives of South News can be found at
http://southmovement.alphalink.com.au/southnews/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/