On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:34:47 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <vlhjkvc12br9jl7uadhsktc5sd6bu5ukg9@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 02:37:24 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

The 'you've got no proof' meme -- 
and that's all it is is a repetitive mind meme to con people 
into believing there is no proof. 

The best way to defeat these people is not to whine and stamp your
feet like you normally do. What you have to do is post some of _your_
evidence. Why won't you do that?

Oh-oh, are you hitting the bottle again Patty?
What's the debunker's favorite whine:
swamp gas and hedge hogs!!!   

Patty, the scientific study of the alien presence
has nothing to do with defeating people,

Quite. So I can expect you to stop your attempts at character
assassination then? I can expect you to stop threatening people who
disagree with you? Or am I expecting too much by thinking you'd follow
your own advice?

it has to do with the verifiable data, not ridiculous
debunking excuses such as ball lightning and
time compressed crash-test dummies or stealth blimps!!

So, if all that is true, why won't you post _any_ of your own
research?

I want to see your verified data. You're the one holding back here. So
please post a case you've researched. Why won't you do it?


David Patrick