On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 06:33:31 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <cgm1lv47nnea74604kegtaii08diitera5@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 14:39:39 GMT, Sir Arthur <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:

In article <h6s0lvok0tpcl5hnre3aal2pqh0chqsuel@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

... hasn't posted one single case he has personally
investigated.

False,

Liar. 

Patty, I am hurt and saddened that you would
fall to the gutter-level of your average debunker!
But it is not totally unexpected, all the tell-tale
signs were there!!  Your constant blathering of
nonsense, your lack of knowledge on this subject
or any subject that has to do with the sciences.

That's the mirror, Flaffer. I'm over here.

But now you have hit rock-bottom, and yes,
I did predict a debunker melt-down, and now
it has come to pass!!

I really do not have time to do a 
Google search, so in the future please
enlighten us with anything you may have
to say, but please make sense.  You are
obviously not a well person!!

Do you expect us to believe that? It'd take two or three minutes max
to find such a post. A post that would shut me up and yet you won't do
it. Can't do it more like.

If you can't find a case of your own, then why not post your opinions
on The Berkshire Triangles case? Why won't you even discuss UFO cases
now?


David Patrick