In article <l29klvs2vvfdh39kdb4uao0j3rttkv0t5d@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:33:39 GMT, Sir Artio <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:

In article <pH76b.8053$Ci1.1269918@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net>, nospam says...

"Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in
message news:cWV5b.18716$cJ5.2498@www.newsranger.com...
...a bunch of totally off-topic meanderings.

Take it somewhere else. Art. Try the other kooks at your AA meeting.
Cliff Smith

That's debunk-ese for "I refuse to argue the facts,
so I will attack the person presenting the facts."
Sorry that your new assignment is to read these
newsgroups, but it is time you learn the truth:

So which case you have researched do you want to argue? 

Okay, I speak debunk-ese.  This little barf-out
by Patty means this Patty #1) Refuses to look
at the fact; (#2) Has his mind made up;
and (#3) Practices science by proclamation,
not investigation.

I will be interpreting future posts by
debunkers because as far as I know,
I am the only one qualified on the Usenet
to interpret debunk-ese.  

Patty mostly is a broken record,
see-no-UFO, hear-no-UFO,
speak-no-UFO.

The reign of the debunkers
is almost over, so humor them until
that day, and when our side takes over,
there will be a quick mop-up job
of these malcontents.

May God or whatever you believe in Patty
have mercy on your soul.

Sir Artio