"Ed Rhodes" <edward.j.rhodes@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:muF7b.12036$KX6.11865@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...

"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:HaycnYhE28uCWcGiXTWJjg@io.com...

"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:gjrolv0e2ikv15jq2haeeh62rlsud9g8k1@4ax.com...

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 01:16:00 -0400 (EDT), nyceddie@webtv.net (E. L.)
wrote:

To keep the controversy going

What controversy?

You mean the confusion and ignorance of a few profoundly stupid
persons (and one talking horse) can be called a controversy?

Question: are any of the Moon Hoax conspiracy theorists suggesting a
smokestack on the moon? Wouldn't that mean they'd have to drop the Moon

Hoax

theory?

Not really, 1) It could be something on a fake film that didn't get
airbrushed out properly

Well, that eliminates the possibility of it being a smokestack on the moon.

or 2) It could be proof of an alien presence on the
moon.

That eliminates the possibility that the apollo project was a hoax.

It's not either of these things of course. But to their way of thinking,

it

[could] be!

The smokestack and moon-hoax theories are mutually exclusive. So if a kook
picks one, he's abandoning the other.

Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet