It is widely known that Saddam, before the United States invaded his
country, went on national television in Iraq, praised the suicide
bombers on the West Bank and even offered the equivilent of $30,000 to
any family that fielded a suicide bomber that killed Isralies. How can
anyone say that there was " no evidence " that Iraq under Saddam did not
support terrorism or was not a terrorist threat!

Or do such so called " peace activist " expect everybody to ignore a
head of state going on national television and rewarding terrorist as an
understandable action unrelated to supporting terrorism? Do they also
expect the killing of jews to be an acceptable justifiable series of
actions? Does the simple fact that Islamic Fanatics hate jews ( and the
whole world for that matter ) justify their terrorist actions in the
mind of such " peace activist "? 

Do they regard the Islamic slaughtering of as many people as they can to
be a state of " peace " and actions taken to stop such a terrorist
onslaught a state of " war"?

Allowing the Third Riech to round up and invade at will , kill at will
would not have researved any state of world " peace " in the last
Century. Likewise in this Century, allowing an Islamic Jihad to run
unabated will in no way resemble a world " peace " but would only be a
world blood bath. 

Peace cannot exist with a Third Riech trying to take over the world nor
a Jihad trying to kill off and terrorise all opposed to it. Such
sinister, genocidale plots must be defeated not accepted, opposed not
supported. 

Likewise those opposing such fanatical, totalitarian ends must be
supported not opposed in putting down such a grim alternative.

For peace, prosperity, progress it is the U.S.A. ALL THE WAY!!!!!


WESLEY