"Katrina" <katrina@mail2cat.com> wrote in message
news:ok34mv0lmtsugm3agpj00fifdur2rick5r@4ax.com...

What an incredibly closed-minded attitude.  You

totally ignore the

issue and questions brought up, and simply tell

the person asking them

to go away.

Why don't you go start your own newsgroup

entitled: "Alien Visitors

Believers Only?"  You remind me of the bumper

sticker I saw that said,

"The Bible said so, and that's it!"  Hogwash!

You talk about Sage being unwilling to learn

something new, try it

yourself.  Your reaction to his posting shows

that you are the one who

doesn't want to learn anything-especially if it

might conflict with

your view.  Those who defend their views with

such close-mindedness

are always wrong.

Now go ahead and tell me to get out of your

newsgroup.  Call me some

names and tell me "not to make any more noise in

this group."  Buddy,

Sage and I have just as much right to be here as

you do.  He's not

telling you to go away, is he?  No, he's

challenging the statements of

another and asking questions.  You're the one

who does not want to

listen.

Katrina


On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:55:10 GMT, "Supertech"

<ejone1@austin.rr.com>

wrote:

Sage or The Sage, whatever, what are you doing

here in the UFO(Alien

Visitors) newsgroup?

Find something that really interests you.  You

have no desire of learning

anything new and no interest in the

extraterrestrial beings etc. Right?

Then GO AWAY..

Don't make any more noise in this group.


"The_Sage" <theeSage@azrmci.net> wrote in

message

news:bu92mv4e6av0lk5e2dfp033qbgef4i19uo@4ax.com..

.

Reply to article by: Sir Arthur

<nospam@newsranger.com>

Date written: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:12:09 GMT

MsgID:<Zo%7b.19593$cJ5.2550@www.newsranger.com>

The UFO Challenge
December 1997
By Stanton Friedman

You call this a challenge?

As a nuclear physicist...

Hold on a moment here! Stanton *was* a

nuclear physicist years and years

ago,

but nowadays he is merely an author of New

Age-like books. His former

career has

absolutely nothing to do with his current

career. In my opinion, I believe

he

likes to hide behind the title "Nuclear

Physicist", even though nuclear

physics

has absolutely nothing to do with UFOs, maybe

because it adds

respectability to

an otherwise silly belief. I mean think about

it: if a Rocket Scientist or

Nuclear Physicist says there is a "Cosmic

Watergate", then by golly, there

certainly must be a "Cosmic Watergate"

because Rocket Scientists or

Nuclear

Physicists are so damn intelligent that it is

physically impossible that

they

could be wrong or could be suckered into a

UFO cult!

...who has had a serious interest in flying

saucers since 1958, I have

reached four major conclusions:

The evidence is overwhelming that Planet

Earth is being visited by

intelligently controlled extraterrestrial

spacecraft. In other words,

SOME UFOs are alien spacecraft. Most are

not.

Research by proclamation, eh?

The subject of flying saucers represents a

kind of Cosmic Watergate,

meaning that some few people in major

governments have known since

July, 1947, when two crashed saucers and

several alien bodies were

recovered in New Mexico, that indeed SOME

UFOs are ET. As noted in

1950, it's the most classified U.S. topic.

None of the arguments made against

conclusions One and Two by a small

group of debunkers such as Carl Sagan, my

University of Chicago

classmate for three years, can stand up to

careful scrutiny.

The Flying Saucer story is the biggest story

of the millennium:

A lot of stuff snipped to save  bandwidth.

Good for you Katrina, there are too many people
that think they have the only answer and will not
hear any questions or any conflicting views.  They
just want everyone with conflicting views to go
away and shut up.  What hypocrites they are.

Also I would like to hear any facts that bodies or
any alien craft of any kind were recovered in New
Mexico or any other place.

Also would like to see evidence that our planet is
being visited by aliens.  Might be a good idea to
give your idea of what evidence is to you whoever
answers.

Harry