| Subject: Re: The UFO Grammar Challenged Ugly Bob |
| From: nyceddie@webtv.net (E. L.) |
| Date: 15/09/2003, 20:47 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.ufo.reports |
Re: The UFO Challenge and the 4 Golden Rules of the Debunkers//spOOks!
Group: alt.alien.visitors Date: Thu, Sep 11, 2003, 7:14pm (EDT-3) From:
ugly_bob42@hotmail.com (Ugly Bob)
"Knud" <Knud@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93F3C00BE9BF8Knudnowherecom@204.127.36.1...
David Patrick <david.patrickNO+SPAM@ntlworld.com> wrote in
news:i9h1mv0dlru5j04rrmg85lqo815q3mcfge@4ax.com:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:12:09 GMT, Sir Arthur <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
In article <cyJ%a.16130$cJ5.1714@www.newsranger.com>, Sir Arthur C. B.
E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. says...
The UFO Challenge By Stanton Friedman
A classic, not a Klass-ick!
Having to applaud your own posts? I thought you'd managed to convince as
many as three kooks you weren't a laughingstock?
David Patrick
How many people have you've convinced you're not a laughingstock?
Have you've been to your English as a second language class today?
-Ugly
Bob
el: "The pot calling the kettle black! U.B., you should have written:
"Have you been to your English ..." Or, better, "Have you attended ..."
But, obviously in your haste to sound off you erred by saying, in
effect, "Have you have been ..." Back to the corner with the duncecap
for you."